911 Finding the Truth Andrew Johnson KFM 06 Sep 2012 Part 1 & 2

911 Finding the Truth Andrew Johnson KFM 06 Sep 2012 Part 2

Sean Stone and Christopher Bollyn on 9 11, Israel & the Mossad

The Truth and Lies of 9-11

Not a shred of evidence that any 9/11 ‘hijackers’ boarded any planes

By Craig McKee

To believe the official story of 9/11 you have to swallow an awful lot. You have to believe the laws of physics can be suspended for a day, that planes can disappear after crashing, and that Muslims accused of being suicide hijackers can still be alive after the deed is done.

About that last one. Essential to the deception was the premise that 19 Muslim extremists hijacked four domestic flights on the morning of September 11, 2001 with the intention of flying them into predetermined targets.

But do we really know who these alleged hijackers were? Do we know they carried out any hijackings? Do we know they were even at the scenes of the crimes? In fact, as researcher Elias Davidsson demonstrates in his recent book Hijacking America’s Mind on 9/11: Counterfeiting Evidence, there is not one shred of authenticated evidence that any of the 19 men blamed for the “attacks” ever boarded any planes. And even if there were, this would not prove they participated in any hijackings.

Davidsson shows that evidence proving that the guilt of the accused hijackers simply does not exist. Beyond that, the names on the official list have changed multiple times with no adequate explanation for why or how. Several accused even turned out to be alive after 9/11, a fact that is not mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report even though it was known long before the report was written. The North American media have also ignored this critical fact.

In his analysis, Davidsson lists five ways that guilt could have been proven but was not (we get into details a bit later):

• Authenticated passenger lists or flight manifests that feature the names of the alleged hijackers;
• Authenticated boarding passes showing that they boarded the planes;
• Sworn testimonies of anyone who witnessed any of the accused boarding;
• Authenticated security videos showing them boarding the planes and;
• Physical remains with chain of custody reports.

Davidsson contends that not only has the government not proven its case against the 19, it has not even established probable cause. READ MORE

Excerpt:

And another name from the Flight 11 list was reported by the Boston Globe to be Abdulrahman al-Omari (who we were told sat next to Mohamed Atta on the plane). But on the list of hijackers released Sept. 14, 2001 by the Justice Department, the name was Abdulaziz al-Omari (sometimes written Abdul Aziz).

Meanwhile, the Washington Post listed the name as Abdulrahman that same day. But Abdulaziz was living in Saudi Arabia, according to the Saudi embassy in Washington. The Independent reported on Sept. 17 that he had walked into the U.S. consulate in Jeddah to demand an explanation for why he was being accused of being a suicide hijacker.

Excerpt:

LIES WITHIN LIES

Maybe the craziest pillar in the whole story comes from the so-called “confession” video of Osama bin Laden that was released in December 2001. The video is clearly a fake given that it features a bin Laden double, and not a very good one at that.[12]

But what’s really intriguing is that the fake bin Laden mentions the name of nine of the alleged hijackers during the confession. But five of those nine ended up still being alive. Why would the real perpetrator of the 9/11 crime give credit to five men who turned out not to be involved?

The story that 19 Muslims named by the FBI were responsible for hijacking four airliners and killing themselves in the process simply cannot stand up to examination. In fact we know for a fact that it is false.

This, like the rest of the official story of 9/11, is so thin you can see right through it. READ MORE

Overwhelming Evidence that 9/11 was an Inside Job, Who did it and Why - Ken O'Keefe

Sean Stone and Christopher Bollyn on 9 11, Israel & the Mossad

Christophoper Bollyn has a few more vids on youtube,  you should probably see them as well since he puts these different but interesting little tidbits in each one.  (start video, right click on it, then select "copy url", then use paste and go, in your browsers url box).  He doesn't get into "no planes" material for some reason,  perhaps he has enough controversy already,  than to heap on even more.  Not a problem, if and when a real investigation gets going,  the "no planes" truth will out. 

9/11 Documentary -The Birth of Treason.

They keep saying "We saw the planes... the planes hit the buildings... the buildings came down?.
But...  Keep in mind that we didn't see any planes hit the buildings,  what we saw was fake videos of planes hitting the buildings.  Planes cannot collide with steel and concrete buildings and go all the way into them because planes are made too weak to do so without breaking apart on impact.  Thus, the 100k the ISI sent Atta, was something induced by someone.  Induced so as to misdirect suspicion away from the fact that there were no hijackers nor planes.  There was only explosives and explosive contrivances used to fake the appearances.  Atta received this 100k while on a Sun Cruise gambling ship that had come to be owned by Jack Abramoff, with the help of a member of Congress, go figure eh?  But I'll leave you
to dig up that story,  just google "Gus Boulis" and have a good read.

Please don't forget to peruse my archives, things that may seem far fetched become more reasonable as you read about secret societies, learn more about World War II, the Dark Ages, the War of the Roses, the Crusades, Roman Empire and history of the world in general. Then it begins to become clear that there is quite a bit more going on than one, not aware of history, would ever be likely to suspect.  Above all, be sure to share these articles on facebook, twitter, and the like.

Judgment Day( 911 Was An Inside Job) Jesse Ventura President 2016 Case Closed!

pulverised & vaporized bodies 911

Dr. Niels Harrit interview with Braindead BBC Reporter (full)

911 A PHYSICAL EDUCATION (Full Length Video)

JEB BUSH Sept 11 2001 Project for NEW AMERICAN CENTURY - The New Pearl Harbor WTC 9/11

Dr. Steven Jones - Nano Thermite [ 9/11 Truth Movement ]

Hmmm... "The Plane is 50 miles out..." Doesn't that imply that they knew where the plane was, where it was going and why something should be done about it? I mean, obviously the report is not that the plane is 50 miles from the airport. Nor is it about an aircraft that does not need to be watched. It is about "THE PLANE", not "A PLANE"  which Cheney acknowledges by assuring that the order still stands despite the fact that the plane is now near its target.  Cheney acknowledges that he is aware of "the plane" he doesn't ask any questions about it,  meaning it's a plane that he expected.

Christopher Bollyn - Solving 9-11 - The Los Angeles Session

You'll want to have a note pad handy and take notes,  names and events.
Also it's time to stop saying the towers collapsed,  start telling the truth, the towers were "destroyed".

Architects and Engineers On 9/11! Excellent Must See!

Recent Court News

QUOTE A lawsuit against members of the Bush administration for their role in the invasion of Iraq recently received noteworthy support from an internationally prominent group of lawyers—including a former U.S. attorney general. The group is asking the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to review the class action suit on grounds that the U.S.-led war was an illegal act of aggression in violation of international guidelines as defined by the Nuremberg Tribunal after World War II.

Iraqi mother Sundus Saleh filed the lawsuit on May 27 against former President George W. Bush, former Vice President Richard Cheney, former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, former National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, former Secretary of State Colin Powell, and former Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, stating they “broke the law in conspiring and committing the crime of aggression against the people of Iraq.” Her complaint filed to the court reads:

Defendants planned the war against Iraq as early as 1998; manipulated the United States public to support the war by scaring them with images of ‘mushroom clouds’ and conflating the Hussein regime with al-Qaeda; and broke international law by commencing the invasion without proper legal authorization. More than sixty years ago, American prosecutors in Nuremberg, Germany convicted Nazi leaders of the crimes of conspiring and waging wars of aggression. They found the Nazis guilty of planning and waging wars that had no basis in law and which killed millions of innocents.[emphasis added]

It should be noted as well that the Nuremberg Tribunal’s findings were specifically quoted in the suit, which has been undertaken as a pro bonocase by Comar Law, based in San Francisco: 

The topic can be found here:
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=22916 

Intelligence Effort Named Citizens, Not Terrorists

This Aug. 25, 2004 file photo shows unidentified analysts
at the Combined Intelligence and Fusion Center for
NORAD/Northcom in Colorado Springs, Colo. A
multibillion-dollar information-sharing program that was
created in the aftermath of 9/11 has improperly collected
information about innocent Americans and produced no
valuable intelligence on terrorism, according to a Senate
report that describes an effort that ballooned far beyond
anyone’s ability to control. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski/File)

A multibillion-dollar information-sharing program created in the aftermath of 9/11 has improperly collected information about innocent Americans and produced little valuable intelligence on terrorism, a Senate report concludes. 

It portrays an effort that ballooned far beyond anyone's ability to control. What began as an attempt to put local, state and federal officials in the same room analyzing the same intelligence has instead cost huge amounts of money for data-mining software, flat screen televisions and, in Arizona, two fully equipped Chevrolet Tahoes that are used for commuting, investigators found. 

 The report underscores a reality of post-9/11 Washington: National security programs tend to grow, never shrink, even when their money and manpower far surpass the actual subject of terrorism. 

When fusion centers did address terrorism, they sometimes did so in ways that infringed on civil liberties. The centers have made headlines for circulating information about Ron Paul supporters, the ACLU, activists on both sides of the abortion debate, war protesters and advocates of gun rights. 

One fusion center cited in the Senate investigation wrote a report about a Muslim community group's list of book recommendations. Others discussed American citizens speaking at mosques or talking to Muslim groups about parenting. No evidence of criminal activity was contained in those reports. The government did not circulate them, but it kept them on government computers. The federal government is prohibited from storing information about First Amendment activities not related to crimes.

Note: For deeply revealing reports from reliable major media sources on civil liberties, click here.

New book points damning finger at Bush administration saying they were warned about 9/11 earlier than first thought

‘500 Days: Secrets and Lies in the Terror Wars’ asserts White House alerted of imminent Bin Laden threat months before 9/11.
Comments (123)

By Corky Siemaszko / NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Tuesday, September 11, 2012, 12:43 PM

The Bush administration was warned that Osama Bin Laden was plotting the Sept. 11 attacks much earlier than previously thought, according to a blockbuster new book.

But President Bush’s advisers, fixated on bringing down Iraqi despot Saddam Hussein, believed Bin Laden was blowing smoke, reporter Kurt Eichenwald claims in “500 Days: Secrets and Lies in the Terror Wars.”

The result was a national tragedy that left nearly 3,000 dead.

President Bush has said repeatedly that he would have done everything in his power to thwart the terror attacks had he known that they were coming. READ MORE

Zimmerman called Sanford police seven times since Aug. 2011

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

LAWYERS WITHDRAW, WEBSITE video:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

London-based oil executive linked to 9/11 hijackers

From left: hijack pilots Mohamed Atta, Marwan
Al-Shehhi and Ziad Jarrah were all said to have
visited the home in Sarasota while learning to fly
at nearby Venice Airport Photo: GETTY

A Saudi Arabian accused of associating with several of the September 11 hijackers and who disappeared from his home in the United States a few weeks before the attacks on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon, is in London working for his country’s state oil company. 

By Anthony Summers, Neil Tweedie and Dan Christensen in Miami

7:30AM GMT 18 Feb 2012

Abdulaziz al-Hijji and his wife Anoud left three cars at their luxurious home in a gated community in Sarasota, Florida — one of them new — and flew to Saudi Arabia in August 2001. The refrigerator was full of food; furniture and clothing were left behind; and the swimming pool water was still circulating.

Security records of cars passing through a checkpoint at the Prestancia gated community indicated that Mr al-Hijji’s home, 4224 Escondito Circle, had been visited a number of times by Mohamed Atta, the leader of the 19-strong hijack team, who piloted American Airlines Flight 11 into the North Tower of the World Trade Centre in 2001.

The logs also indicated that Marwan Al-Shehhi, who crashed United Airlines Flight 175 into the South Tower, and Ziad Jarrah, who was at the controls of United Airlines Flight 93 when it crashed in a field in Pennsylvania, had visited the house.

All three men had trained to fly at Venice Airport, which is 19 miles from Sarasota.
  READ MORE