A collection of articles defining our times. The pages contain clickable links, don't let the titles fool you, some of the best articles have very non-descript titles and there are usually more articles on the matters in the days and week pages the links land on so it's a sort of treasure hunt through history, Enjoy!
Pages
- WELCOME TO THE NEW WORLD ODOR (#1) | (hint: It stinks)
- SAVED STUFF #9 (CLICKABLE LINKS)
- ALL ABOARD FOR 2024 (What you're voting for/against?) #5
- ALL ABOARD FOR 2024 (What you're voting for/against?) #4
- ALL ABOARD FOR 2024 (What you're voting for/against?) #3
- SAVED STUFF #8 (CLICKABLE LINKS)
- SAVED STUFF #7 (CLICKABLE LINKS)
- ALL ABOARD FOR 2024 (Look at what you're voting for/against?) #2
- ALL ABOARD FOR 2024 (Look at what you're voting for/against?)
- THE MID TERM ELECTIONS
- THE JANUARY 6TH FILES AND HEARINGS
- HOW THE AMERICAN DEMOCRATIC EXPERIMENT ENDS?
- Home
- THE HORRIBLE TRUMP PRES. 28
- AMERICA EXPOSED #4
- AMERICA EXPOSED #3
- AMERICA EXPOSED #2
- AMERICA EXPOSED
- THE HORRIBLE TRUMP 27
- THE HORRIBLE TRUMP 26
- THE HORRIBLE TRUMP 25
- THE HORRIBLE TRUMP PG 24
- THE HORRIBLE TRUMP 23
- THE HORRIBLE TRUMP 22
- The Horrible Trump Prsdncy 21
- The Horrible Trump Prsdncy 20
- The Horrible Trump P 19
- The Horrible Trump Prsdncy 18
- The Horrible Trump Prsdncy 17
- The Horrible Trump Prsdncy 16
- The Horrible Trump Prsdncy 15
- The Horrible T P 14
- T.H.T PRESIDENCY 13
- T. H. T. PRESIDENCY 12
- T.H.T. PRESIDENCY 11
- THE HORRIBLE T. P. 10
- HORRIBLE TRUMP 9
- THE HORRIBLE TRUMP PAGE 8
- THE HORRIBLE TRUMP PAGE 7
- THE HORRIBLE TRUMP PRESIDENCY 6
- THE HORRIBLE TRUMP PRESIDENCY 5
- THE HORRIBLE TRUMP PRESIDENCY 4
- HORRIBLE TRUMP PRESIDENCY ( PAGE 3)
- THE HORRIBLE. PRESIDENCY (2)
- THE HORRIBLE TRUMP PRESIDENCY
- THE 911 VIDEOS AND BASICS
- 911 Page Two
- JEFFERY EPSTEIN FILES (2) JULY 2024 (Clickable links)
- THE JEFFERY EPSTEIN FILES (clickable links)
- THE CORBET REPORTS
- MICHAEL COHEN HEARINGS COLLECTION
- THE MISC. COLLECTION AND THE LIBRARY LINK
- SAVED STUFF
- SAVED STUFF 2
- SAVED STUFF THREE (3)
- SAVED STUFF #4
- THE GREEN NEW PAGE
- SAVED STUFF #5
- SAVED STUFF #6
- Bag Man Podcast - Episode 1 - 7 | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC
Thursday, December 31, 2015
Wednesday, December 30, 2015
Emailed to Morgan Reynolds
You've got more evidence:
Besides the absent wake vortexes, which show that no planes flew through those areas on 911. I've used an air speed to force converter to simplify the kinds of forces that would be acting at the building walls of the WTC, of course, you'll have to clean up my quick 'n dirty work.
Steel is damaged by explosives by generating forces of between 125,370 lb/sqft (or air moving at 6818.2 mph) up to 1,128,400 lb/sqft (or air moving at 20,455 mph).
While commercial passenger air craft is built to withstand ~674.23 lb/sq.ft. (or air moving at ~500 mph)
Now, when the aircraft meets the tower wall, both are subjected to the exact same forces. Therefore, how is an aircraft that can only survive, the force of air moving at 500 mph, by being kept within a tight range of attitudes/angles of attack/etc., manage to survive long enough, to apply forces of 125,370 lb/sq.ft. when it cannot survive the forces exceeding only 674.23 lb/sq.ft.?
Obviously the aircraft must break apart, long before it can apply enough force to break the several steel columns it will impact. When it does break apart, it sheds it's ability to direct it's maximum force into the towers, as it's energy is being consumed by its own destruction.
Please work up your own figures as I would like to see them in your new video, along with the matter of the absent wake vortexes which prove conclusively that no commercial passenger aircraft flew along the required paths.
Thank you
Besides the absent wake vortexes, which show that no planes flew through those areas on 911. I've used an air speed to force converter to simplify the kinds of forces that would be acting at the building walls of the WTC, of course, you'll have to clean up my quick 'n dirty work.
Steel is damaged by explosives by generating forces of between 125,370 lb/sqft (or air moving at 6818.2 mph) up to 1,128,400 lb/sqft (or air moving at 20,455 mph).
While commercial passenger air craft is built to withstand ~674.23 lb/sq.ft. (or air moving at ~500 mph)
Now, when the aircraft meets the tower wall, both are subjected to the exact same forces. Therefore, how is an aircraft that can only survive, the force of air moving at 500 mph, by being kept within a tight range of attitudes/angles of attack/etc., manage to survive long enough, to apply forces of 125,370 lb/sq.ft. when it cannot survive the forces exceeding only 674.23 lb/sq.ft.?
Obviously the aircraft must break apart, long before it can apply enough force to break the several steel columns it will impact. When it does break apart, it sheds it's ability to direct it's maximum force into the towers, as it's energy is being consumed by its own destruction.
Please work up your own figures as I would like to see them in your new video, along with the matter of the absent wake vortexes which prove conclusively that no commercial passenger aircraft flew along the required paths.
Thank you
Tuesday, December 29, 2015
Monday, December 28, 2015
Sunday, December 27, 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Steel box column: 125,370 lb/sq.ft (low)
Worse yet is the fact that the aircraft has to break several steel columns, not just one.