A collection of articles defining our times. Over here, articles live forever... The pages contain clickable links, don't let The titles fool you; some of the best articles have very non-descript titles, and there are usually more articles on the matters in the days and weeks The links land on, so it's a sort of treasure hunt through history, Enjoy! /\ \/ After you click on a page, just scroll down to see the links. Hmmm... it seems no one is allowed to subscribe, can you guess why? lol.
Pages
- SAVED STUFF #24 (CLICKABLE LINKS) — 07/10/26
- MIDTERMS 2026 — (4)
- MIDTERMS 2026 — (3)
- SAVED STUFF #23 (CLICKABLE LINKS) — 06/30/26
- MIDTERMS 2026 — (2)
- UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT MATTERS — (TWO)
- DJT's DANGEROUS STINKY POO 2.0 THE NEW WORLD ODOR #30 05/27/26
- MIDTERMS 2026
- THE INTERNATIONAL PAGE — 07/07/25 — 04/10/26
- A COLLECTION OF IMAGES 04/11/26
- SAVED STUFF #22 (CLICKABLE LINKS) — 04/04/26
- DJT's DANGEROUS STINKY POO 2.0 THE NEW WORLD ODOR #29 04/25/26
- DJT's DANGEROUS STINKY POO 2.0 THE NEW WORLD ODOR #28 04/03/26
- SAVED STUFF #21 (CLICKABLE LINKS) — 03/28/26
- DJT's DANGEROUS STINKY POO 2.0 THE NEW WORLD ODOR #27 03/15/26
- DJT's DANGEROUS STINKY POO 2.0 THE NEW WORLD ODOR #26 02/21/26
- THE GREEN NEW PAGE
- SAVED STUFF #20 (CLICKABLE LINKS) — 02/02/26
- DJT's DANGEROUS STINKY POO 2.0 THE NEW WORLD ODOR #25 01/30/26
- DJT's DANGEROUS STINKY POO 2.0 THE NEW WORLD ODOR #24 01/17/26
- DJT's DANGEROUS STINKY POO 2.0 THE NEW WORLD ODOR #23 01/06/26
- SAVED STUFF #19 (CLICKABLE LINKS) — 12/02/25
- UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT MATTERS
- JEFFERY EPSTEIN FILES (#4) MARCH 9, 2026 (Clickable links)
- JEFFERY EPSTEIN FILES (#3) JULY 2024 (Clickable links)
- JEFFERY EPSTEIN FILES (2) JULY 2024 (Clickable links)
- TRUMPS DANGEROUS STINKY POO 2.0 THE NEW WORLD ODOR #22 12/16/25
- TRUMPS DANGEROUS STINKY POO 2.0 THE NEW WORLD ODOR #21 11/24/25
- TRUMPS DANGEROUS STINKY POO 2.0 THE NEW WORLD ODOR #20 10/24/25
- SAVED STUFF #18 (CLICKABLE LINKS)
- TRUMPS DANGEROUS STINKY POO 2.0 THE NEW WORLD ODOR (#18) 9/17/25
- TRUMPS DANGEROUS STINKY POO 2.0 THE NEW WORLD ODOR (#17) 8/25/25
- TRUMPS DANGEROUS STINKY POO 2.0 THE NEW WORLD ODOR (#16) 8/2/25
- SAVED STUFF #17 (CLICKABLE LINKS)
- SAVED STUFF #16 (CLICKABLE LINKS)
- SAVED STUFF #15 (CLICKABLE LINKS)
- TRUMPS DANGEROUS STINKY POO 2.0 THE NEW WORLD ODOR (#15) 7/9/25
- TRUMPS DANGEROUS STINKY POO 2.0 THE NEW WORLD ODOR (#14) 6/27/25
- SAVED STUFF #14 (CLICKABLE LINKS)
- TRUMPS DANGEROUS STINKY POO 2.0 THE NEW WORLD ODOR (#13) 6/13/25
- TRUMPS DANGEROUS STINKY POO 2.0 THE NEW WORLD ODOR (#12) 5/31/25
- TRUMPS DANGEROUS STINKY POO 2.0 THE NEW WORLD ODOR (#11) 5/21/25
- TRUMPS DANGEROUS STINKY POO 2.0 THE NEW WORLD ODOR (#10) 4/24/25
- SAVED STUFF #13 (CLICKABLE LINKS)
- TRUMPS DANGEROUS STINKY POO 2.0 THE NEW WORLD ODOR (#9) 4/24/25
- TRUMPS DANGEROUS STINKY POO 2.0 THE NEW WORLD ODOR (#19) 10/6/25
- WELCOME TO TRUMPS DANGEROUS STINKY POO 2.0 THE NEW WORLD ODOR (#8) 3/28/25
- WELCOME TO TRUMPS DANGEROUS STINKY POO 2.0 THE NEW WORLD ODOR (#7) 3/15/25
- WELCOME TO TRUMPS DANGEROUS STINKY POO 2.0 THE NEW WORLD ODOR (#6) 3/2/25
- WELCOME TO TRUMPS DANGEROUS STINKY POO 2.0 THE NEW WORLD ODOR (#5) 2/16/25
- SAVED STUFF #12 (CLICKABLE LINKS)
- SAVED STUFF #11 (CLICKABLE LINKS)
- WELCOME TO TRUMPS DANGEROUS STINKY POO 2.0 THE NEW WORLD ODOR (#4) 2/1/25
- WELCOME TO TRUMPS DANGEROUS STINKY POO 2.0 THE NEW WORLD ODOR (#3) 1/25
- WELCOME TO THE NEW WORLD ODOR (#2) | (hint: It stinks)T
- WELCOME TO THE NEW WORLD ODOR (#1) | (hint: It stinks)
- SAVED STUFF #10 (CLICKABLE LINKS)
- SAVED STUFF #9 (CLICKABLE LINKS)
- ALL ABOARD FOR 2024 (What you're voting for/against?) #5
- ALL ABOARD FOR 2024 (What you're voting for/against?) #4
- ALL ABOARD FOR 2024 (What you're voting for/against?) #3
- SAVED STUFF #8 (CLICKABLE LINKS)
- SAVED STUFF #7 (CLICKABLE LINKS)
- ALL ABOARD FOR 2024 (Look at what you're voting for/against?) #2
- ALL ABOARD FOR 2024 (Look at what you're voting for/against?)
- THE MID TERM ELECTIONS
- THE JANUARY 6TH FILES AND HEARINGS
- HOW THE AMERICAN DEMOCRATIC EXPERIMENT ENDS?
- Home
- THE HORRIBLE TRUMP PRES. 28
- AMERICA EXPOSED #4
- AMERICA EXPOSED #3
- AMERICA EXPOSED #2
- AMERICA EXPOSED
- THE HORRIBLE TRUMP 27
- THE HORRIBLE TRUMP 26
- THE HORRIBLE TRUMP 25
- THE HORRIBLE TRUMP PG 24
- THE HORRIBLE TRUMP 23
- THE HORRIBLE TRUMP 22
- The Horrible Trump Prsdncy 21
- The Horrible Trump Prsdncy 20
- The Horrible Trump P 19
- The Horrible Trump Prsdncy 18
- The Horrible Trump Prsdncy 17
- The Horrible Trump Prsdncy 16
- The Horrible Trump Prsdncy 15
- The Horrible T P 14
- T.H.T PRESIDENCY 13
- T. H. T. PRESIDENCY 12
- T.H.T. PRESIDENCY 11
- THE HORRIBLE T. P. 10
- HORRIBLE TRUMP 9
- THE HORRIBLE TRUMP PAGE 8
- THE HORRIBLE TRUMP PAGE 7
- THE HORRIBLE TRUMP PRESIDENCY 6
- THE HORRIBLE TRUMP PRESIDENCY 5
- THE HORRIBLE TRUMP PRESIDENCY 4
- HORRIBLE TRUMP PRESIDENCY ( PAGE 3)
- THE HORRIBLE. PRESIDENCY (2)
- THE HORRIBLE TRUMP PRESIDENCY
- THE 911 VIDEOS AND BASICS
- 911 Page Two
- THE JEFFERY EPSTEIN FILES (clickable links)
- THE CORBET REPORTS
- MICHAEL COHEN HEARINGS COLLECTION
- THE MISC. COLLECTION AND THE LIBRARY LINK
- SAVED STUFF
- SAVED STUFF 2
- SAVED STUFF THREE (3)
- SAVED STUFF #4
- SAVED STUFF #5
- SAVED STUFF #6
- Bag Man Podcast - Episode 1 - 7 | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC
Showing posts with label Bush. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bush. Show all posts
Friday, May 27, 2016
JFK - The George H. W. Bush Connection
Wednesday, December 10, 2014
17 Disgraceful Facts Buried In The Senate’s 600 Page Torture Report
![]() |
| CREDIT: AP |
The Senate Intelligence Committee’s report on the CIA’s extensive use of torture reveals that the agency regularly misled the White House and Congress about the information it had obtained from detainees and used techniques that are far more brutal than it — or former Bush administration officials — had previously acknowledged.
For its part, the CIA acknowledged that it “did not always live up to the high standards that we set for ourselves” and “made mistakes” in how it ran the program, particularly “early on” when the CIA “was unprepared and lacked the core competencies required.” However, it insisted that “there are too many flaws for [this report] to stand as the official record of the program” and strongly disputed “that the agency’s assessments were willfully misrepresented in a calculated effort to manipulate.”
Republicans are similarly shielding the agency from criticism, claiming that the report is “ideologically motivated and distorted recounting of historical events.” “The fact that the CIA’s Detention and Interrogation program developed significant intelligence that helped us identify and capture important al-Qa’ida terrorists, disrupt their ongoing plotting, and take down Usama Bin Ladin is incontrovertible,” Sens. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Saxby Chambliss (R-GA), vice chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, said in a statement. READ MORE
Saturday, February 2, 2013
How the Deficit Got This Big
Editorial | Deconstruction
By TERESA TRITCH
Published: July 23, 2011
With President Obama and Republican leaders calling for cutting the budget by trillions over the next 10 years, it is worth asking how we got here — from healthy surpluses at the end of the Clinton era, and the promise of future surpluses, to nine straight years of deficits, including the $1.3 trillion shortfall in 2010. The answer is largely the Bush-era tax cuts, war spending in Iraq and Afghanistan, and recessions.
Despite what antigovernment conservatives say, non-
defense
discretionary spending on areas like foreign aid, education and food
safety was not a driving factor in creating the deficits. In
fact, such spending, accounting for only 15 percent of the budget, has
been basically flat as a share of the economy for decades. Cutting it simply will not fill the deficit hole.
The first graph shows the difference between budget projections and budget reality. In 2001, President George W. Bush inherited a surplus, with projections by the Congressional Budget Office for ever-increasing surpluses, assuming continuation of the good economy and President Bill Clinton’s policies. But every year starting in 2002, the budget fell into deficit. In January 2009, just before President Obama took office, the budget office projected a $1.2 trillion deficit for 2009 and deficits in subsequent years, based on continuing Mr. Bush’s policies and the effects of recession. Mr. Obama’s policies in 2009 and 2010, including the stimulus package, added to the deficits in those years but are largely temporary. READ MORE
Wednesday, September 12, 2012
New book points damning finger at Bush administration saying they were warned about 9/11 earlier than first thought
![]() | ||
Comments (123)
By Corky Siemaszko / NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Tuesday, September 11, 2012, 12:43 PM
The Bush administration was warned that Osama Bin Laden was plotting the Sept. 11 attacks much earlier than previously thought, according to a blockbuster new book.
But President Bush’s advisers, fixated on bringing down Iraqi despot Saddam Hussein, believed Bin Laden was blowing smoke, reporter Kurt Eichenwald claims in “500 Days: Secrets and Lies in the Terror Wars.”
The result was a national tragedy that left nearly 3,000 dead.
President Bush has said repeatedly that he would have done everything in his power to thwart the terror attacks had he known that they were coming. READ MORE
Friday, April 13, 2012
Spain Proceeding With Bush Torture Case
![]() |
| Detainees at Guantanamo Bay are watched by military police. (photo: Reuters) |
By Carol Rosenberg, The Miami Herald
16 January 12
The Obama administration may want to look forward but but other countries are still interested in determining whether Bush-era anti-terror practices violated international law.
The twin developments demonstrated that while the
Obama administration has stuck to its promise not to investigate whether
Bush administration officials acted illegally by authorizing the use of
harsh interrogation techniques, other countries are still interested in
determining whether Bush-era anti-terror practices violated
international law.
In Madrid, Judge Pablo Rafael Ruz Gutierrez handed
down a 19-page decision Friday in which he said he would seek additional
information - medical data, a translation of a Human Rights Watch
report, elaboration on material made public by WikiLeaks, and testimony
from three senior U.S. military officers who served at Guantánamo - in
the case of four released Guantánamo captives who allege they were
humiliated and subjected to torture while in U.S. custody. READ MORE
Friday, April 6, 2012
Maddow relays censored memo on CIA ‘war crimes’ during Bush Administration
By Eric W. Dolan
Thursday, April 5, 2012 0:05 EDT
MSNBC host Rachel Maddow on Wednesday night explained a legal memo that advised the Bush Administration that so-called enhanced interrogation techniques were torture and therefore illegal.
Wired reporter Spencer Ackerman obtained the memo, written by State Department counselor Philip Zelikow, through a Freedom on Information Act request.
Bush told NBC’s Matt Lauer in 2010 that he authorized the use of enhanced interrogation techniques like waterboarding because his “lawyer said it was legal, said it did not fall within the Anti-Torture Act.” But Zelikow’s memo warned the Bush Administration in 2006 that the interrogation techniques used on terror suspects by the CIA were “a felony war crime.”
“As a top lawyer at the Bush State Department, Philip Zelikow circulated the memo within the Administration that said, essentially, that the Administration was kidding itself in trying to say that there was some way around the law,” Maddow explained. “They were trying to give a legal green light to CIA interrogator to torture people, but that green light, he said, was a sham.”
In 2009, Zelikow said that the Bush Administration attempted to collect and destroy all copies of the memo.
“If the Republican Party were the still the party of John McCain, this would open up a whole new can of political worms,” Maddow said, “because the Obama Administration, remember, looked into Bush Administration ordered torture and they decided not to prosecute any of it.” READ MORE
Thursday, April 5, 2012 0:05 EDT
MSNBC host Rachel Maddow on Wednesday night explained a legal memo that advised the Bush Administration that so-called enhanced interrogation techniques were torture and therefore illegal.
Wired reporter Spencer Ackerman obtained the memo, written by State Department counselor Philip Zelikow, through a Freedom on Information Act request.
Bush told NBC’s Matt Lauer in 2010 that he authorized the use of enhanced interrogation techniques like waterboarding because his “lawyer said it was legal, said it did not fall within the Anti-Torture Act.” But Zelikow’s memo warned the Bush Administration in 2006 that the interrogation techniques used on terror suspects by the CIA were “a felony war crime.”
“As a top lawyer at the Bush State Department, Philip Zelikow circulated the memo within the Administration that said, essentially, that the Administration was kidding itself in trying to say that there was some way around the law,” Maddow explained. “They were trying to give a legal green light to CIA interrogator to torture people, but that green light, he said, was a sham.”
In 2009, Zelikow said that the Bush Administration attempted to collect and destroy all copies of the memo.
“If the Republican Party were the still the party of John McCain, this would open up a whole new can of political worms,” Maddow said, “because the Obama Administration, remember, looked into Bush Administration ordered torture and they decided not to prosecute any of it.” READ MORE
Sunday, March 11, 2012
How the GOP Might Try to Steal the 2012 Election
![]() |
| TEN YEARS LATER |
Democrats had better hope that the coming elections are not too close because the GOP is honing its vote stealing skills in its own primaries:
GOP state party snafus all have benefited Romney:
As we wrote yesterday, the Michigan Republican Party voted Wednesday night to award its two at-large delegates to the statewide winner instead of dividing up proportionally, as we (and even the Michigan GOP chairman at one time) had assumed. That move gave Romney a 16-14 delegate edge in the state instead of a 15-15 tie, and it has produced a firestorm of controversy. What’s more, it’s the latest GOP state party snafu this primary season that’s benefited Romney.
Consider: The Iowa Republican Party originally declared Romney the winner there (and even once the vote count had changed, it was hesitant to declare Santorum the new winner). In addition, the Maine GOP badly mishandled its caucuses (one county wasn’t counted due to snow, other results got lost in a spam folder), and Romney narrowly won that contest. And now you have the delegate drama in Michigan, which now allows Romney to claim a win there in both the popular vote and delegate count.
It's
important to remember that they have two main methods of stealing
elections. The first is vote suppression, in which they make it
difficult for their opponents to cast votes. This is nothing new
historically and it's not been confined to one party. But the modern
Republicans have put their very special stamp on the practice by using
reverse psychology and whining about non-existent voter fraud to claim
they have been the victims of the terrible ACORN conspiracy to cancel
out their decent Real American vote. (This was one of the bogus
arguments used inBush vs Gore, which serves as a sort of template for
their various legal arguments.)
Labels:
Bush,
challenges,
control the count,
Iowa,
Karl Rove,
Republican,
Romney,
tricks,
Voter suppression
Thursday, February 16, 2012
Televangelist Pat Robertson joins ‘Obama dictatorship’ conspiracy
![]() |
| Pat Robertson |
Wednesday, February 15, 2012 15:43 EST
Even though the claim is wildly inaccurate, President Barack Obama’s critics have for years been calling him a “dictator,” and on Wednesday morning televangelist Pat Robertson joined the conspiracy parade by insisting that Obama secretly “wants to take control of every aspect of this nation by the federal government.”
“If you want a dictatorship, then that’s the way to get it because he’s giving it to you,” the 81-year-old said.
It wasn’t clear what exactly Robertson was talking about, other than making rambling allegations, but the claim that Obama wants to become a “dictator” springs from conservative backlash against President George W. Bush’s bailout of Chrysler and General Motors — a policy the Obama administration adopted and furthered to a considerable extent.
But most disappointing to many Republicans: While President Obama definitely owns the auto bailouts, Bush won’t stop taking credit for them.
“I didn’t want there to be 21 percent unemployment,” the former president told an audience in Las Vegas on Monday. “Sometimes circumstances get in the way of philosophy. I said, ‘No depression.’”
READ MORE
Labels:
700 club,
Bush,
dictator,
Obama,
Pat Robertson,
republicans
Sunday, February 5, 2012
Why Do Dangerous Financial Criminals Roam Free?
February 4, 2012
American Public Media's
"Marketplace" had a recent segment focused on why it has taken so long
to bring criminal prosecutions related to the financial crisis.
Reporters observed that at the beginning of the crisis, the Obama
administration wanted to calm the financial industry rather than impose
accountability. They speculated, along with Tea Party and Occupy Wall
Street participants, many of whom have been calling for prosecutions,
that Obama’s creation of a new group to prosecute mortgage fraud led by
New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman was likely to be
politically motivated. And they indicated that financial crimes are
complex and prosecutors need time to develop their cases.
But
here's what they didn't say: A major reason the prosecutions don’t
exist is that President George W. Bush took the cops off the beat.
Think
about street crime. Imagine, for example, a protection racket in which
gangs extort payment from fearful shopkeepers. Prosecutors rarely
initiate criminal prosecutions; indeed, they may not even know that the
crime is occurring. The police pound the beats that keep them aware of
the increase in crime, respond to complaints, investigate, determine
that a crime may have occurred that warrants attention, create a file
and send it to the prosecutor’s office. In routine cases, the
prosecution proceeds on the basis of the police report alone. In more
complex cases, the prosecutor may supplement the police investigation.
But prosecutors rarely initiate cases. Even when a task force is
appointed to target crime in a particular sector, it typically involves
prosecutors working with the police. The prosecutors simply don’t have
the skills or the manpower to detect crime, conduct investigations and
make the record necessary to prosecute. READ MORE
Labels:
Bush,
cases,
Eric Schneiderman,
Financial Crime,
impunity,
off the beat,
police,
prosecutions,
steal
Tuesday, December 13, 2011
Bush's Faith-Based Gravy Train
By Howard Bess
January 25, 2009
Editor’s Note: When the American Right began its dramatic rise in the early 1980s, one of its early slogans was “Defund the Left” — by gutting government-funded social programs managed by liberal organizations. Two decades later, George W. Bush’s administration went further, into “Funding the Right.”
In this guest essay, Rev. Howard Bess looks at how Bush institutionalized these political subsidies under the umbrella of his faith-based initiatives:
During the presidential tenure of George W. Bush, a very significant, largely unnoticed organizational innovation took place.
I am not writing about the Department of Homeland Security. Homeland Security is very visual. Anyone who travels is aware of Homeland Security. The agency has become a reluctantly accepted fact of American life.
Rather I am writing about the Bush administration’s Faith-Based and Community Initiative. With little scrutiny the U.S. government has fundamentally changed its approach to meeting the needs of Americans who are poor or in need of some sort of public help.
READ MORE
Saturday, September 24, 2011
Is the Saudi Royal Family Connected to 9/11 Hijackers?
New evidence links the Saudi royal family to Saudis in South Florida, who reportedly had contact with the 9/11 hijackers before fleeing the US prior to the attacks.
September 22, 2011
WhoWhatWhy has found evidence linking the Saudi royal family to Saudis in South Florida who reportedly had direct contact with the 9/11 hijackers before fleeing the United States just prior to the attacks. Our report connects some of the dots first laid out by investigative author Anthony Summers and Florida-based journalist Dan Christensen in articles jointly published in the Miami Herald and on the nonprofit news site BrowardBulldog.org.
In early September of this year, Summers and Christensen reported that a secret FBI probe, never shared with Congressional investigators or the presidential 9/11 commission, had uncovered information indicating the possibility of support for the hijackers from previously unknown confederates in the United States during 2001.
Now WhoWhatWhy reveals that those alleged confederates were closely tied to influential members of the Saudi ruling elite.
READ MORE
Labels:
911,
911 Commission,
Atta,
Bush,
FBI,
Sarasota,
Saudi Connection,
terrorists
Thursday, September 22, 2011
9/11: A Conspiracy Theory In 5 Minutes
Labels:
911,
Bin Laden,
Bush,
cheney,
CIA,
Condolezza,
FBI,
Fight UA 93,
Flight AA11,
Flight AA77,
Flight UA 175,
Mohammad Atta,
Powel,
Rumsfeld,
Shanksville,
The Pentagon,
WTC1,
WTC2,
WTC7
Sunday, September 18, 2011
Bush's Toronto appearance cancelled
14 Sep 2011 Next week's appearance by former U.S. president [sic] George W. Bush at an event hosted by a local evangelical Christian university has been cancelled. The decision came Wednesday, the same day three former students launched a petition urging the university to cancel the speech. On Tuesday, a class valedictorian and professor publicly spoke out against the appearance following the resignation of another staff member. Bush was scheduled to speak Sept. 20 to about 150 people at an invitation-only breakfast hosted by Tyndale University College and Seminary, home to about 1,400 students at two campuses in Toronto's north end.
READ MORE
Monday, September 12, 2011
FOCUS: George Lakoff | 9/11, Intimidation via Framing
George Lakoff, Reader Supported News
George Lakoff begins: "My wife, Kathleen, and I stood gaping at the TV as we watched the towers fall. Kathleen said to me, 'Do you realize what Bush and Cheney are going to do with this?' We both realized very well."
READ MORE
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










