My point would be, not whether he is controllable, but how useful
would he be in gathering kompromat on other valuable "resources"?
After all, you don't need to bring someone inside for them to be
useful, and if you can "push and pull" others into his circle to see
if they can be compromised, so that they, too, can be of use to you
so much the better.
The objective in intelligence is not to only work with people who
can be trusted, but to devise ways to deal with untrustworthy
people who are in positions where they move in various social,
and/or, official circles. Jeffrey Epstein was his own kompromat
generator; if he could not be controlled by the threat of
disclosure, that would be very unlikely in the extreme.
I'm sorry, but if this lady is really as skilled as she claims to be,
then she is simply dissembling. Even people who read spy
novels know better than to believe what she is saying.
The most valuable assets are the compromised people
who have little choice but to either comply with commands
or face being destroyed.
OMG, what is this woman talking about? Jeffery Epstein
would know as well as anyone that Intelligence agencies can
play "above the law' games and "issue get-out-of-jail-free",
cards when it is in their interest to do so, making them a
tremendous, invaluable resource to anyone committing
crimes that would ruin them if discovered. For her to put
this off as a mere "vanity" exercise on the part of
being full of himself is an absurdity beyond belief!
Any intelligence agency that knew what Jeffery was about
could not resist being involved with him in some way or other.
To do anything less than that would be sheer incompetence
of breathtaking proportions.
No comments:
Post a Comment