I know we're not supposed to take the 5th as an indication of guilt. But instead of simply taking the fifth and leaving it at that, he says he fears his testimony would be self-incriminating. Now he's a lawyer so he knows the law and can look up the precedents, so if he says in effect: "What I know is very likely a crime that I participated in.", why shouldn't I take him at his word?
A collection of articles defining our times. The pages contain clickable links, don't let the titles fool you, some of the best articles have very non-descript titles and there are usually more articles on the matters in the days and week pages the links land on so it's a sort of treasure hunt through history, Enjoy!
No comments:
Post a Comment