Okay, we learned that the videos are fakes because any commercial passenger aircraft would have been a "cream puff" against the steel and concrete structure of the towers (see my previous posts). Now attention has turned to the videos and photos of the planes.
After examining the videos, shown in my previous posts, I've learned what seems to answer some question about how the videos may have been constructed, but since I am not a qualified analyst I can only give my opinion and leave it to others with creds to determine if, what I think is. what is really going on and where.
It seems to me that the videos are a montage of live shots with backgrounds made up of still photos. I think these backgrounds were prepared, in advance, using stills from 9-11's of previous years. That would explain how they get the shadows to match 9-11, while allowing them to quickly add the additional features they needed. That also explains why the sky and the background had to be dropped out of various plane approach videos. Obviously, if you use a still photo in a video and there happens to be a bird, plane or helicopter in the sky, it would hang motionless in the video, thus the sky would have to be changed.
While, the background of buildings etc., would not change as the viewing angle changed, so if the camera had to move, the background had to be dropped. Also, another problem with the background is that, over time the skyline changes, buildings get torn down and new buildings get built, so there's a limit to how much of the old you can use, when and where.
But the critical issue facing the planners was speed. Very early on there were mentions of bombs going off and word of no planes, lack of sound etc., which is incredibly odd, given the data release depicts aircraft moving at high speeds where the engines would be open full bore. Remember when Air Force One was flown low over the area off southern Manhattan? It generated numerous call to 911, as did Captain Skullys' plane, when it landed without engines on the Hudson.
So, the perps were pressed for time, they needed to get live shots of planes hitting the towers on the air for reporters and news anchors to point to, so as to silence without argument, any who would say there was no planes or that they didn't see one. The public's belief that the video will faithfully capture what they may have missed and their faith in TV's reports, would lead some to misremember and/or substitute an imaginary version of events to be in line with the video "evidence". After all, they'd be in such a state of confusion, who would think to question video footage, obviously seen by millions of people, at that time?
But, to make that angle work for them, at a time when all eyes and cameras were focused on the towers, nothing less than "live" footage would do, the public would have just such an expectation and if they failed to deliver it would seriously count against them. Although manipulating live video footage requires a stabilized feed, a gyro stabilized camera can provide that, even from a shifting helicopter platform. So that can be achieved if the need is there for it and a professional with the right skills is available. As long as the strike point and time are known in advance, much of the preparations can be done in advance, leaving only minor adjustments to be made before releasing a finished product.
I note that when I subject screen captures to various image editing tools, I see odd pixel densities and halos which may be an indication of editing, layering and/or masking or some other sort of manipulation, but it will take an imaging/video professional to tell what, if anything, such artifacts mean.
I have no idea, where this "search for the truth", will actually lead, except that, the more people who feel the need for better answers will mean that, it will be much more difficult for anyone to mount yet another false flag plan, even if this wasn't one, as it appears to be so far.
Even then there's the matter of justification(s). Some have surmised that it was all a plan in defense of the dollar by means of protecting it's oil backing. I am familiar with imagined currency protection scenarios, I haven't yet been able to imagine one that works. Thus, if that is what this was all about, then a backup plan is a must. If so, then as the hurricane said to the palm "hold onto your nuts this will be no ordinary blow job". So, I rather hope that's not the case and that it was the misguided work of some secret society cabal, trying to simply grab power or profit. You do know that secret societies exist don't you? This very nation was created by one. The Founding Fathers could not very well have revealed their plans early on, or they'd have simply been arrested and tried for treason. Enough said.
With Warm Regard To All, Keep On The Case!
After examining the videos, shown in my previous posts, I've learned what seems to answer some question about how the videos may have been constructed, but since I am not a qualified analyst I can only give my opinion and leave it to others with creds to determine if, what I think is. what is really going on and where.
It seems to me that the videos are a montage of live shots with backgrounds made up of still photos. I think these backgrounds were prepared, in advance, using stills from 9-11's of previous years. That would explain how they get the shadows to match 9-11, while allowing them to quickly add the additional features they needed. That also explains why the sky and the background had to be dropped out of various plane approach videos. Obviously, if you use a still photo in a video and there happens to be a bird, plane or helicopter in the sky, it would hang motionless in the video, thus the sky would have to be changed.
While, the background of buildings etc., would not change as the viewing angle changed, so if the camera had to move, the background had to be dropped. Also, another problem with the background is that, over time the skyline changes, buildings get torn down and new buildings get built, so there's a limit to how much of the old you can use, when and where.
But the critical issue facing the planners was speed. Very early on there were mentions of bombs going off and word of no planes, lack of sound etc., which is incredibly odd, given the data release depicts aircraft moving at high speeds where the engines would be open full bore. Remember when Air Force One was flown low over the area off southern Manhattan? It generated numerous call to 911, as did Captain Skullys' plane, when it landed without engines on the Hudson.
So, the perps were pressed for time, they needed to get live shots of planes hitting the towers on the air for reporters and news anchors to point to, so as to silence without argument, any who would say there was no planes or that they didn't see one. The public's belief that the video will faithfully capture what they may have missed and their faith in TV's reports, would lead some to misremember and/or substitute an imaginary version of events to be in line with the video "evidence". After all, they'd be in such a state of confusion, who would think to question video footage, obviously seen by millions of people, at that time?
But, to make that angle work for them, at a time when all eyes and cameras were focused on the towers, nothing less than "live" footage would do, the public would have just such an expectation and if they failed to deliver it would seriously count against them. Although manipulating live video footage requires a stabilized feed, a gyro stabilized camera can provide that, even from a shifting helicopter platform. So that can be achieved if the need is there for it and a professional with the right skills is available. As long as the strike point and time are known in advance, much of the preparations can be done in advance, leaving only minor adjustments to be made before releasing a finished product.
I note that when I subject screen captures to various image editing tools, I see odd pixel densities and halos which may be an indication of editing, layering and/or masking or some other sort of manipulation, but it will take an imaging/video professional to tell what, if anything, such artifacts mean.
I have no idea, where this "search for the truth", will actually lead, except that, the more people who feel the need for better answers will mean that, it will be much more difficult for anyone to mount yet another false flag plan, even if this wasn't one, as it appears to be so far.
Even then there's the matter of justification(s). Some have surmised that it was all a plan in defense of the dollar by means of protecting it's oil backing. I am familiar with imagined currency protection scenarios, I haven't yet been able to imagine one that works. Thus, if that is what this was all about, then a backup plan is a must. If so, then as the hurricane said to the palm "hold onto your nuts this will be no ordinary blow job". So, I rather hope that's not the case and that it was the misguided work of some secret society cabal, trying to simply grab power or profit. You do know that secret societies exist don't you? This very nation was created by one. The Founding Fathers could not very well have revealed their plans early on, or they'd have simply been arrested and tried for treason. Enough said.
With Warm Regard To All, Keep On The Case!
No comments:
Post a Comment