Alfred Schaefer 2014 “The Gatekeepers of 9/11“ HD

9-11 Research (link to site)

An Attempt to Uncover the Truth About September 11th, 2001

We all know the official story of September 11th: four jetliners were hijacked by groups of four and five Arabic men armed with box cutters, who proceeded to fly three of the four jets into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon. Subsequently the World Trade Center Towers, weakened by the impacts and fires, collapsed into piles of rubble. The FBI had compiled a list of hijackers within three days, and it was so obvious that Osama bin Laden had masterminded the operation from caves in Afghanistan, that there was no need to seriously investigate the crime or produce evidence. The "retaliatory" attack on the Taliban would soon commence.
Is this story true? Its central assumptions have never been tested by an official government body whose members lack obvious conflicts of interest. There are numerous red flags in the official story, which requires a long series of highly improbable coincidences. Questioning that story is an act of responsible citizenship.
------------------------------------------------
from a pdf linked from that site:
------------------------------------------------

It appears reasonable to believe that the NIST report stops short of dealing with the mechanism of collapse precisely because their early modeling showed collapse due to fire

and plane damage to be impossible.  

As the conclusion of their report is not in accord with 

their own data it appears that the report was written under duress. Investigation of this possibility is urgently required.

-------------------------------------

------------------------------------- 

Gee, what else is new? The Bush Administration held the nation under duress. 

Michio Kaku - Sciencey Stuff

9/11 Conspiracy Documentary - Painful Deceptions

Jeb Bush: "Please clap"

911 Passengers Could be Fictitious- Part 1

No planes crashed ANYWHERE on 911. READ DESCRIPTION.

Description and my notes below.

Published on Jan 4, 2015

 Use this link if video is blocked in your country. http://vimeo.com/115801417

This video is dedicated to everyone who still believes that real planes crashed on 9/11. I ask everyone to forget everything you have learned or have been told about 9/11. Start here with a fresh clean slate and let your mind go blank. For the information in this video will prove conclusively that NO REAL PLANES were used on 9/11.

This subject has been talked about since at least 2005/6 and despite years of ridicule it is this information that stands out as the truth. Years of psychological mainstream media propaganda has poisoned peoples minds into accepting an official story so riddled with errors and impossibilities that it makes a mockery of all that we know about science, engineering and aviation today.

Keep an open mind and just listen to the real evidence and see for yourself that no real planes could've caused the damage we saw at all four crash sites on 9/11.

Impossible Physics, Speeds, G-Forces, Manoeuvres and Impact Dynamics.
Lack of debris, lack of any physical evidence, no serial numbers,
no DNA identification or any bodies,
false flight data recorder and no plane recovery identity done by the FAA.

The documentation that shows Flight's 11 & 77 did not take off on 9/11 and that ACARS data shows Flights 93 & 175 were still airborne after their alleged crash times.

No passenger manifests, boarding cards, ground crew testimony no confirmed CCTV footage of any of the hijackers arriving at the airports or boarding the planes. And the fact that several hijackers were still alive after 9/11.

The evidence that goes against the no planes on 9/11 is quite extensive while evidence that goes the other way is almost non existent. It is this evidence that has been ignored and ridiculed by lying and corrupt media, politicians and military towards citizens who have demanded answers.

PLEASE DOWNLOAD A COPY OF THIS VIDEO AND SHARE WITH EVERYONE. Category People & Blogs License Standard YouTube License Music "Hymne" by Armin van Buuren Listen ad-free with YouTube Red
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
MY NOTES: (to which I will add from time to time)

The supporters/witnesses/investigators etc., of the official version of 911, have to date told so many falsehoods, changed their stories so many times,  been caught making impossible claims, hidden/destroyed evidence and such that, they have long since surrendered any shred of credibility needed to have any further claims taken at face value without substantial proof.

The claim that flight 93 impacted the soft ground at 500+mph, that it completely sank from view beneath the soil, is patently false,  unless they can show that the ground was softer than water.  Airliner crashes into water proves that planes are not strong enough to penetrate water at high speeds without breaking into many parts.

They show a piece of fuselage on top of the WTC debris pile,  yet, since both aircraft were supposedly inside the towers when the towers exploded so violently that, bodies were blown into hundreds of pieces and no office furniture, file cabinets  computers, refrigerators, safes and other appliances survived intact.  Where even acres of concrete and thousands of tons of steel were turned to dust, they would have us believe that approximately 7 feet of fuselage managed to survive intact. Including the bodies of a hijacker strapped into a cockpit seat.  And a flight attendant who had been on the phone almost until impact,  somehow had the hijackers tie her hands behind her back with wire before impact.