Pages

Sunday, July 22, 2012

Farm Bill Budget Cuts Will Mean Millions of Americans Go Hungry

Homeless families like this one will feel the brunt of
budget cuts. (photo: Mary Ellen Mark/Time-Life)
By John Turner, Guardian UK
21 July 12

One in seven Americans relies on food stamps, yet lawmakers are plotting to balance the budget on the backs of the neediest.

he test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.

So said President Franklin D Roosevelt, over 75 years ago, in his second inaugural address. This idea could not be any more important than now, when the health of millions of children, their families and older adults are in danger.

Last Wednesday, the agriculture committee of the House of Representatives voted to pass dramatic cuts to the Farm Bill. If passed by Congress, the legislation will remove $16.5bn from food and hunger relief programs that directly benefit children, seniors and families.
Approximately 80% of the Farm Bill budget funds the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Snap) - commonly known as food stamps. As 45 million people - one in seven Americans - currently rely on Snap to help feed and nourish themselves and their families, the program provides the first line of defense in our country's hunger relief network.

The proposed cuts will affect between 2 and 3 million Americans, and more than 300,000 people in Texas, where I work. These people are our neighbors, classmates, co-workers, relatives and friends. Make no mistake, these cuts will hurt many families already straining to pay their summer electric bills, rent and gas, making it harder to put food on their tables.

As almost three in five Snap recipients are children or seniors, the advancement of this legislation is especially troubling as the majority of those who stand to lose Snap benefits are the most vulnerable in our society. The impact will ripple across our country starting in our retirement communities and schools.  READ MORE

No comments: