In effect, we're being told that a man, who after being cctv'd in a bank with a gun and the teller handing over cash, is later arrested with the marked bills from the bank and marker dye from the anti-theft device, the case is too complicated to be able to say with any confidence that the bank robber will be convicted at trial because; we need to know what he intended to do with the money, what he had for breakfast and how he was raised by his parents and how he interacted with his family members and schoolmates among other things. Look, Trump is known for destroying documents and resisting releasing them to official inqiireries, as well as having no intentions of honoring official records acts and even outrageously committing crimes by using the phones of others in order to evade his records reporting responsibilities, and yet when caught in flagrant violation of laws his word -- the word of an accomplished liar who has told over 40,000 lies -- is taken as credible and his outrageously obvious crimes and obvious criminal intent is judged to be far too complex to be seen as what it appears to be. Please give us a break, we need better excuses than that.
No comments:
Post a Comment