I know we're not supposed to take the 5th as an indication of guilt. But instead of simply taking the fifth and leaving it at that, he says he fears his testimony would be self-incriminating. Now he's a lawyer so he knows the law and can look up the precedents, so if he says in effect: "What I know is very likely a crime that I participated in.", why shouldn't I take him at his word?
No comments:
Post a Comment