For almost a year now, the nation has been locked in almost constant
debate over various state and federal versions of the Religious Freedom
and Restoration Act (RFRA), a 20-year-old law that was broadened by the
Supreme Court in 2014 and has since been embraced by right-wing
politicians and pundits — especially religious conservatives. But in an
unusual twist, an atheist activist is galvanizing support for a legal
campaign to use the federal RFRA to remove the phrase “In God we trust”
from U.S. coins and paper bills.
Even more unusual: it just might work.
Michael Newdow, who unsuccessfully sued to have “Under God” removed from the Pledge of Allegiance in 2004, published a guest post on the The Friendly Atheist blog last Friday outlining a new initiative to challenge the decades-old policy of printing the religiously themed American national motto on U.S. currency. He explained that while courts have dismissed claims that the phrase violates the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution — which prohibits Congress from passing laws that establish one religion above others — his new legal argument is rooted in RFRA’s stipulation that religious activity cannot be “substantially burdened” without a “compelling government interest.” The government’s interest in emblazoning currency with “in God we trust,” Newdow argues, is suspect.
READ MORE
Even more unusual: it just might work.
Michael Newdow, who unsuccessfully sued to have “Under God” removed from the Pledge of Allegiance in 2004, published a guest post on the The Friendly Atheist blog last Friday outlining a new initiative to challenge the decades-old policy of printing the religiously themed American national motto on U.S. currency. He explained that while courts have dismissed claims that the phrase violates the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution — which prohibits Congress from passing laws that establish one religion above others — his new legal argument is rooted in RFRA’s stipulation that religious activity cannot be “substantially burdened” without a “compelling government interest.” The government’s interest in emblazoning currency with “in God we trust,” Newdow argues, is suspect.
READ MORE
No comments:
Post a Comment