IF HER CONDITION IS VERIFIED AS INTOXICATED
SHE CANNOT BE EXPECTED TO ABSORB THE ABUSE
AND STILL BE THE RATIONAL ACTOR REQUIRED TO
CALL THE AUTHORITIES TO ACTION, MOST
ESPECIALLY AS WOMEN ARE HISTORICALLY
TREATED AS COMPLAINANTS AGAINST MALES.
BUT THEN, WHY, WE MUST ASK, IS THERE NO
REQUIREMENT PLACED UPON THE MALE
ACTORS TO HAVE RESPONDED MORALLY
TO A SITUATION THEY KNOW WAS WRONG,
WRONG, WRONG?!
THEY KNEW IT WAS WRONG, BECAUSE WE
KNOW THAT, HAD THE GIRL BEEN ONE OF
THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS OR A LOVE INTEREST
THEY WOULD HAVE DEFENDED HER TO THEIR
END. SO, WHY SHOULD THEY BE EXCUSED
FROM BEING HONORABLE AND PROTECTIVE
OF AN INCAPACITATED INDIVIDUAL?
No comments:
Post a Comment