So, the Republican argument is: The nation should be unified in letting the President commit high crimes and misdemeanors because to hold him accountable for his transgressions would split the nation and pit those who believe treason and sedition should be excused, against those who believe it should be punished. Why should it be divisive to punish a President who committed crimes? Shouldn't we be united in wishing that criminals be brought to justice?
No comments:
Post a Comment