The online peanut gallery can get you so riled up that your ability to reason goes out the window, a new study finds.
| Thu Jan. 10, 2013 3:06 AM PST
Everybody who's written or blogged about climate change on a
prominent website (or, even worse, spoken about it on YouTube) knows the
drill. Shortly after you post, the menagerie of trolls arrives.
They're predominantly climate deniers, and they start in immediately
arguing over the content and attacking the science—sometimes by slinging
insults and even occasional obscenities. To cite a recent example:
What part of "we haven't warmed any in 16 years" don't you understand? Heh. "Cherry-picking" as defined by you alarmists: any time period selected containing data that refutes your hysterical hypothesis. Can be any length of time from 4 billion years to one hour. Fuck off, little man!It was reasonably obvious already that these folks were doing nothing good for the public's understanding of the science of climate change (to say nothing of their own comprehension). But now there's actual evidence to back this idea up. READ MORE
No comments:
Post a Comment