Senator Sheldon Whitehouse: Dark Money, The Supreme Court, and What Come...

Using circumstantial evidence to convict is difficult depending on how many

reasonable alternative explanations there are available.  Of course,

when there is more than one instance of circumstantial evidence, 

then it becomes a problem to explain the two instances with an 

alternative that is still reasonable for the given situation.  

Obviously a third instance of circumstantial evidence

and the defense begins to tie itself in knots trying to weave a path

between the three instances and still appear to have a reasonable

alternative to the trajectory of guilt. Insert an instance or two of

direct evidence and the task of refuting guilt becomes ever less

accessible.

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

=============================================

---This missive is brought to you by Citizens for milk and 

honey, peace, prosperity, rainbows, unicorns, puppies, 

and kittens. Please give till it hurts.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hahaha       (Warning: Here There Be Dragons) /|\

=============================================

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@