Is he saying that the witness might not be so credible having been convicted him or her self? As if no prosecutor has ever put a witness of compromised credibility on the witness stand before and had a jury decide that just maybe the word of the "compromised" witness was more credible than what the defense was providing? I'm sure that given the facts a jury would take the word of "compromised" Cohen over "unindicted coconspirator" Donald Trump a habitual liar where the New York Times counts more than 40,000 lies he has told in 4 years, from the oval office too boot.
A collection of articles defining our times. The pages contain clickable links, don't let the titles fool you, some of the best articles have very non-descript titles and there are usually more articles on the matters in the days and week pages the links land on so it's a sort of treasure hunt through history, Enjoy!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Just keep it civil.