Question: Were these lawyers aware of any of the 60 cases that had been filed with the courts? If so, then why did they not bring their evidence into court? Why did they leave Giuliani hanging in court without any evidence to present and therefore obtain a summary dismissal? What do they expect the public to do with their "evidence" after they avoided or otherwise failed to present it for judicial review? If Giuliani was right, then why was his law license suspended or revoked by a Judge who saw no merit to any of his filings?
A collection of articles defining our times. The pages contain clickable links, don't let the titles fool you, some of the best articles have very non-descript titles and there are usually more articles on the matters in the days and week pages the links land on so it's a sort of treasure hunt through history, Enjoy!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Just keep it civil.