Sep 21 2011, 2:49 PM ET
The White House's new campaign banner/economic principle is the
so-called "Buffett Rule," which holds that no millionaire should pay a
lower effective tax rate than a typical middle class family. Sound
sensible, yes? Of course it does. The tax code is progressive and
purposefully so. Marginal income tax rates increase with income. The
more you make, the greater share of income you pay. Disagreeing with
this general principle puts you to the right of a typical Republican.
But
the Buffett Rule wasn't meant to hold up to strict constructionism.
"You cannot build a tax code on the principle that no millionaire, ever,
should ever have an effective tax rate lower than their secretary," my Atlantic colleague Megan McArdle wrote
this morning. Well, you could, she allows, but you'd have to give the
IRS extralegal responsibilities to seize rich people's income beyond
what they owe.
To understand why, consider the 76 million people
who don't legally owe individual income taxes in 2011 (please, please
note: does not include payroll, excise, state and local taxes). The vast
majority of this group was poor. They didn't owe individual income
taxes because they didn't owe a lot of money to start, and various
exemptions, like the earned income tax credit, wiped out the rest.
But
among families making more than $100,000, there were also half a
million tax units -- enough to replace the population of Tucson, Arizona
-- that also paid no income tax. Even more surprising, 7,000 millionaires also paid no individual income tax.
READ MORE
Google Search "Millionaires Pay No Taxes"
No comments:
Post a Comment
Just keep it civil.