# 8/3/11 at 11:55 AM # 42Comments
The takeaway from today's New York Times article about a lawsuit over actress Faye Dunaway's Upper East Side apartmentis not that she's another movie star unfairly using New York's rent stabilization laws to keep a posh pied-รก-terre in the city. (Although, evidence suggests that she does live in West Hollywood and is using the $1,048.72-a-month East 78th Street walk-up as a living space for her son, Liam Dunaway O'Neill.) No, the point the paper seems to try to make is that Ms. Dunaway is ... kind of ... poor:
READ MORE
No comments:
Post a Comment
Just keep it civil.