A collection of articles defining our times. The pages contain clickable links, don't let the titles fool you, some of the best articles have very non-descript titles and there are usually more articles on the matters in the days and week pages the links land on so it's a sort of treasure hunt through history, Enjoy!
Saturday, May 14, 2016
Thursday, May 12, 2016
Proof Of Controlled Demolition on 9/11
Published on Aug 23, 2012
Dr.
Niels Harrit Professor Emeritus of Chemistry at the University of
Copenhagen discusses his peer reviewed paper that proves the controlled
demolition of WTC1, WTC2 & WTC7 on 9/11
Published on Aug 23, 2012
Wednesday, May 11, 2016
The Long and Winding Road of History
 |
| Birds of a Feather... |
The British went them one better, they combined republican law rule with military might and added political trickery/treachery to the mix. Then came America and it created the worlds first "dream government", a rule of law that allow the people to decide what laws should be passed. The trouble with this form of government is, it requires "an informed public" to persevere. So, they set up schools and everyone was required to learn the fundamentals, (reading, writing and arithmetic, humorously called "the three R's").
Unfortunately, after the second world war, the military industrial complex was built and, with it came the need for it to perpetuate itself. To do this and ensure it could persist, it had to first dumb down education, leaving the population mentally disabled. This would make it easier to manipulate the public's mind set. Then weaponize all technology to keep government military spending high, the cold war did much to help further this leg of the enterprise by providing the necessary issues.
In the early days of television, there wasn't much that could be done to manipulate the content the stations carried. Thus came the phrase "As seen on TV", because there was very little manipulation of presentations possible. For a good long while, if you saw someone doing something on tv, they actually had to be able to do it. With the advent of recording and play back devises that began to change. Unfortunately public awareness did not keep up with these new technologies. Thus, trust in tv actually grew when it should have been shrinking. The trickery started with programs like Leo G. Carrol in "Topper" (google for it) and escalated through to "I Dream of Jeannie" By way of which, the public should have learned that tv could no longer be trusted. Even to this day, people place more faith and trust in video recordings, than even what they've seen with their own eyes (an MIT study has shown).
It's too bad that there are evil and greedy people in the world, who would like to see everything done their way. They are after the ultimate political power and that requires military might. To get hold of absolute power they need to manipulate the body politic and the handy tools are, fear and hate. These two emotions bring people to approve of wars, and wars give the powerful the powers they need to reek mayhem as they see fit and make quite a bit of cash while doing so. You do not want these kinds of people in either government or your military, since no good can ever come of their designs.
Tuesday, May 10, 2016
Monday, May 9, 2016
Sunday, May 8, 2016
9/11 Was A Mossad Operation - The 5 Dancing Israelis (play list)
Play list of 21 short videos (at least you'll be informed of diverse opinions)
9/11 Jewish State Foreknowledge & 'The Dancing Israelis'
Here is the youtube results page for "Dancing Israeli's"
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=dancing+israelis
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=dancing+israelis
911.The 5 Dancing Jews' Van With The Mural of a Plane Hitting The WTC
This guy says he knows where the dancing pictures are:
https://youtu.be/xMGhcHrQ-gQ
Missing Links - 911 - Dancing Israelis.flv
Politics by Poison?
https://tinyurl.com/y2cpsmxx
17 More DISTURBING 9/11 Facts You'll Wish Weren't True - Pt 2
Whoa, wait just a cotton picking minute! Why, in the world, were
they upgrading fireproofing protection, when the towers were loaded
with asbestos that the PA didn't want to pay over 1 billion dollars to
remove? Worse yet, why does the lease transfer to Silverstein, who
was the low bidder?
The transfer of a lease would not have absolved the Port Authority of the duty to clean up the properties asbestos problems. So the usual way these things are done is to have the new leaseholder assume this responsibility and post a performance bond to ensure the task gets done. Yet, we see no evidence that the Port Authority ever required him to assume liability for the clean up, nor any demand for any bond to assure such performance.
Remember, the parties both have lawyers and are aware of these conditions, so why are they not a material part of the transaction? The deal is consummated as if the parties both expected the problem to somehow simply go away, which it did, in a supposedly unpredictable fashion.
Absent the 911 attacks, Silverstein would have either made a very bad deal, if he had assumed liability for the clean up, or he had made a very good deal if he didn't. The Port Authority, on the other hand, would have made a deal which put them on the hook, to not only have to pay for the clean up, but to also have to indemnify Silverstein for any hardship the process caused, like a delay in him renting the property and having to move existing tenants out of a hazardous environment.
The Port Authority is no stranger to loading lessees with their own liabilities and demanding performance bonds to ensure the lessees abate them.
The transfer of a lease would not have absolved the Port Authority of the duty to clean up the properties asbestos problems. So the usual way these things are done is to have the new leaseholder assume this responsibility and post a performance bond to ensure the task gets done. Yet, we see no evidence that the Port Authority ever required him to assume liability for the clean up, nor any demand for any bond to assure such performance.
Remember, the parties both have lawyers and are aware of these conditions, so why are they not a material part of the transaction? The deal is consummated as if the parties both expected the problem to somehow simply go away, which it did, in a supposedly unpredictable fashion.
Absent the 911 attacks, Silverstein would have either made a very bad deal, if he had assumed liability for the clean up, or he had made a very good deal if he didn't. The Port Authority, on the other hand, would have made a deal which put them on the hook, to not only have to pay for the clean up, but to also have to indemnify Silverstein for any hardship the process caused, like a delay in him renting the property and having to move existing tenants out of a hazardous environment.
The Port Authority is no stranger to loading lessees with their own liabilities and demanding performance bonds to ensure the lessees abate them.
The Five Dancing Israelis - 9/11/2001 - Our Purpose Was To Document The Event
HERE'S THE YOUTUBE SEARCH RESULTS PAGE FOR DANCING ISRAELI'S
Always be sure to watch more than just one video on any subject.