Saturday, July 16, 2016

7-16-16 Errata

Cheney in the Bunker with orders

Cheney is tracking "THE PLANE" from 50 miles out,  only his man has to be using the very same system that NORAD is using,  yet NORAD can't find the plane, even while air traffic controllers are following it on their scopes, NORAD send it's interceptors out over the Atlantic.  Meanwhile, nobody asks how it comes to be that Cheney has given orders about something no one in his adm., could imagine.  SMH

Silverstein and the towers with asbestos

Since no one could have imagined 911, one is given to wonder,  just what grand plan Silverstein had,  to abate the billion dollar liability he and his companies had just assumed.  I mean,  it's one thing to take over the towers on the cheap,  really quick and double the terrorist insurance,  but if the 911 attacks hadn't happened,  what good would all that have done?  So,  unless he had some grand plan to raise the billion needed to remove the asbestos,  all he had going for him and his companies was a hope that terrorists would somehow destroy the towers before the EPA declared them a health hazard and ordered them evacuated.  So,  he bet it all on a hope that,  something he couldn't imagine would happen.  What a way to do business eh?

Friday, July 15, 2016

The Truth and Lies of 9-11

Mike Ruppert at Portland State University, Nov. 28, 2001

9/11 VicSims: The Actors

9/11 VicSims: The Actors 

 Encoding data anomalies of some 9/11 victims 


(Part1 - 3) 911 Simple Physics Structural Failure Vs Demolition

(Part1) 911 Simple Physics Structural Failure Vs Demolition


(Part2) 911 Simple Physics Structural Failure Vs Demolition

(Part3) 911 Simple Physics Structural Failure Vs Demolition



Ron Paul Warns of Dollar Collapse 100% on 27 September 2016 .


  Well, I've figured out what will really happen, too bad i have to keep that a secret since that is my safety net. But I can tell you this, don't do anything rash. Sure, take some gold and silver, but there are two critical factors that these doomsayers either leave out, or more likely, just miss entirely. Which is to say that sure, there will certainly be some upheavals coming, but nothing physically catastrophic. The "haves" cannot afford to let that happen or they'd be toast themselves. Thus what they will eventually do will be to, as usual, belatedly do the right thing, because they finally have no other choice.

Oh yes, they keep talking about "entitlements", but don't worry, they're safe. They'll figure out, if they haven't already done so, that messing with entitlements spells their own certain doom since it would trigger the first wave of a catastrophic sequence that would trigger a deep emotional public response that would be almost impossible to reverse. As the panic would devolve into widespread chaos, against which almost nothing could work. Force might work for a short while, but itself would only add to the chaos and diminish the hopes of reversing it. Under such conditions you cannot maintain armies, every country would break down into gangs, some small some large, but none with any real power. These gangs would only be able to act locally and where resources are scarce they'd have to move against neighbors, creating an unstoppable mess that will only abate upon decimation. It could take decades before anything resembling a social order could begin to form from the ashes.

But don't worry, they're not about to let the world go that route. They already know the way out, but they're against taking it. Partly because some of them see short term advantages for themselves they'd like to access. And partly because it will be a bitter pill for them to have to swallow. But swallow it they will since the alternatives are just too terrible to contemplate.

  1. While money creates control over society and places it in the hands of a few, the other side of the coin is, money allows society to be what it is. So, take it away and those with money have control over nothing. You cannot expect to have orderly control over a society that ceases to exist. Oh there, I've let the cat out of the bag. Okay, their only choice is to repair the financial system in some very credible ways. Sequestration and forgiveness are two very powerful tools they really don't want to use. But the really nasty one is to outlaw fiat currencies and create currency links. What is so distasteful about these measures is, they add up to massive deflation, and deflation means that the little guy's money gains more value. Hardly a wonder they'll resist almost to the end, having to give back what they've been taking and lock the vault to boot. 
The debtors and lenders are all hostages of the same system,  they have no choice!

They had no planes on 911

The fact is, they had no planes.

Because they had no hijackers,  all they had was a hastily pulled together list of Muslim names, some of whom were probably dead already and some of whom were later found to be quite alive.

They had a passport and a drivers license, but were in a quandary as to how they could be used, running out of time, they decided on the simple expedient of "finding" them in the area nearby. Leaving the public to surmise that; oh yeah, the passport and license just happened to escape the fiery plane crashes that consumed everything else and brought down the buildings besides.  Thus,  they would rely on public emotion and grief to stop people from thinking about the details.  Details which could only lead to the unthinkable conclusion that insiders,  not terrorists,  were behind these events.

Rather than reach such unpalatable conclusions,  people would rather believe that perhaps someone was misspeaking and/or that early reports were being garbled/mangled,  thus giving a false impression of what "could not possibly have occurred".

Meanwhile, they knew they could not use planes. No matter what, they knew that real planes would not go completely inside the buildings. Thus, damage to the buildings, if it was to appear to be great enough to compromise the structures, would have to be created by explosives.

So, if you tried to use real planes, you'd have to have some way to fly them into exact points on the towers, to match where the explosives were planted. You would have to have them arrive at the exact point in time of detonation.  Then you would have to have them strike at the precise attitude that the explosives would create the impact pattern to display. 

In such a scenario there would be no room for error. But, there is no system, automated or otherwise, that could provide the accuracy necessary. So, you can't use real planes, because if you did, you'd also have the even more complex task of providing bodies, luggage, plane parts id and some means of controlling all of it so that it didn't fall into the wrong hands and expose the effort. That would put too many operatives on location for what was supposedly a surprise attack!

Despite that some will say, that they couldn't do it this way, because of this or that, the fact remains that they've been successful for the last 15 years of keeping the cover up going. Worse yet is the fact that key people, who might have had things to say to the contrary of the official story, have died of "accidents" or "suicide". Which, of course, makes it hard to build a case. The toxicity of the air, in the aftermath, guarantees that many eyewitnesses will have a very short life span remaining.  That, coupled with the additional time to create more fake evidence,  suborn more fake testimony,  chances are greater that so many of the real facts can be compromised, contested, confused or otherwise mangled, that no successful detection of the real perps could be had.

We know for a fact that, at any crime scene, the guilty party(ies), (are) is the only ones interested in preventing any investigation. So, then, how did OBL prevent an investigation from uncovering his guilty? Or should we think that we'd get better results if Al Capone were put in charge of the FBI? Yeah! Right!?

What Happened to the Planes and Passengers on 9-11?

Aircraft vs Building Strength

The energy of the aircraft is more than enough to damage the steel, but, because the aluminum is so much softer than steel, it breaks apart first, long before it reaches the point where the steel suffers any distortion. Here are the figures:

The speed of air that will tear a plane apart at sea level densities is 500 mph.

At 500 mph air creates a force equal to 674 pounds per square foot.

If an aircraft is not carefully controlled in it's flight path, 500 mph air will rip it apart at a sea level air density of 14.7 psi.

 Okay,  so that's how strong or weak an aircraft is.  now let's see how much force it takes to break a 14 inch box steel column.

 Explosives experts will use a charge designed to move air at between  6818.2 mph and 20455 mph,  which translates into forces of 125,370  pounds per square foot of pressure at the low end,  to a high of 1,128,400 pounds per square foot  of pressure respectively.

So we have Aircraft............ 674.23 lb/sq.ft
Steel box column:........125,370...... lb/sq.ft  (low)
Steel box column: ......1,128, (high)

 Worse yet is the fact that the aircraft has to break several steel columns,  not just one.
 If the aircraft must break at any pressure above 674.23 lb/sq.ft. how
can it possibly stay intact and exert a force of over 125 thousand
pounds per square foot,  to over 1 million pounds per square foot,  on
the steel columns?  That would be like saying that an egg could
penetrate a concrete wall if thrown hard enough.  It can't.  It will
crack open and spread it's force over a wide area,  without ever even
coming close to generating the force needed to penetrate the concrete. 

A 100 ton hollow ball of clay,  moving at 500 mph,  does have the energy needed to destroy a steel box column,  but,  because of it's softness/inability to withstand the pressure/forces needed to damage the column,  it will never do any damage to the steel. Thus the plane becomes a "bug on the windshield" in effect, it splatters.

Tuesday, July 12, 2016


Next problem the east wall of the south tower! What's up with that? There's nothing moving in the correct direction, with enough force to take out all those box columns, and jet fuel only moves air at approximately 100 ft/second or ~90 mph. Hardly enough to take out windows designed to withstand 140 mph winds. You'd certainly think that any parts, with enough force to damage steel box columns would also be able to exit the building through the glass windows.  Yet, the only thing that comes out is a jet fuel fireball, which doesn't have enough force to even break the glass. So, without breaking through the glass, where does the oxygen come from,  for the fire to get hot enough to melt anything at all.

The upshot of which is to say that the east wall damage had to be the result of planted explosives.