Saturday, July 9, 2016

AN UP DATED VERSION 9/11 - Loose Change: Final Cut FULL VERSION


9/11 Files - The Real Hijackers (Part One)



What Happened to the 9/11 "Planes" and "Hijackers"?



9/11 Fake-Witness Actor Gary Welz Reveals More Secrets






(2016) 9/11 Actor Exposed - Fake Witness Live on TV



Friday, July 8, 2016

End Of The USA Dollar BRICS over 23 Counties leave US Currency


Think of gold prices a a function of public trust...

Where you see there are two iterations of the same feature, the second one a larger version of the first. What do you guess the size of the third iteration of those features will be next?  The public,  worldwide may be  losing faith that elected officials can manage or govern effectively.  If such an assertion is true, then the next iteration will be shockingly enormous.

Looks to me like this climb is going to be a very big one. Gov't's have always made mistakes,  it's when there are no consequences for poor performance,  that people begin to wonder and lose faith.  After all,  inflation robs you of your work product.  When bad decisions waste the public treasury,  in the past, either taxes rose or wars ensued.  Today that has changed and the method of choice to replenish the treasury is inflation,  so as people see that bad work holds no consequences for public figures,  one can oly expect more bad decisions and therefore more inflation.  Just sayin. 

Sunday, July 3, 2016

9-11 Research (link to site)

An Attempt to Uncover the Truth About September 11th, 2001

We all know the official story of September 11th: four jetliners were hijacked by groups of four and five Arabic men armed with box cutters, who proceeded to fly three of the four jets into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon. Subsequently the World Trade Center Towers, weakened by the impacts and fires, collapsed into piles of rubble. The FBI had compiled a list of hijackers within three days, and it was so obvious that Osama bin Laden had masterminded the operation from caves in Afghanistan, that there was no need to seriously investigate the crime or produce evidence. The "retaliatory" attack on the Taliban would soon commence.
Is this story true? Its central assumptions have never been tested by an official government body whose members lack obvious conflicts of interest. There are numerous red flags in the official story, which requires a long series of highly improbable coincidences. Questioning that story is an act of responsible citizenship.
------------------------------------------------
from a pdf linked from that site:
------------------------------------------------

It appears reasonable to believe that the NIST report stops short of dealing with the mechanism of collapse precisely because their early modeling showed collapse due to fire
and plane damage to be impossible.  

As the conclusion of their report is not in accord with 
their own data it appears that the report was written under duress. Investigation of this possibility is urgently required.
-------------------------------------
------------------------------------- 
Gee, what else is new? The Bush Administration held the nation under duress. 

Michio Kaku - Sciencey Stuff