Monday, May 23, 2016

Not a shred of evidence that any 9/11 ‘hijackers’ boarded any planes

Not a shred of evidence that any 9/11 ‘hijackers’ boarded any planes

By Craig McKee

To believe the official story of 9/11 you have to swallow an awful lot. You have to believe the laws of physics can be suspended for a day, that planes can disappear after crashing, and that Muslims accused of being suicide hijackers can still be alive after the deed is done.

About that last one. Essential to the deception was the premise that 19 Muslim extremists hijacked four domestic flights on the morning of September 11, 2001 with the intention of flying them into predetermined targets.

But do we really know who these alleged hijackers were? Do we know they carried out any hijackings? Do we know they were even at the scenes of the crimes? In fact, as researcher Elias Davidsson demonstrates in his recent book Hijacking America’s Mind on 9/11: Counterfeiting Evidence, there is not one shred of authenticated evidence that any of the 19 men blamed for the “attacks” ever boarded any planes. And even if there were, this would not prove they participated in any hijackings.

Davidsson shows that evidence proving that the guilt of the accused hijackers simply does not exist. Beyond that, the names on the official list have changed multiple times with no adequate explanation for why or how. Several accused even turned out to be alive after 9/11, a fact that is not mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report even though it was known long before the report was written. The North American media have also ignored this critical fact.

In his analysis, Davidsson lists five ways that guilt could have been proven but was not (we get into details a bit later):
  • Authenticated passenger lists or flight manifests that feature the names of the alleged hijackers;
  • Authenticated boarding passes showing that they boarded the planes;
  • Sworn testimonies of anyone who witnessed any of the accused boarding;
  • Authenticated security videos showing them boarding the planes and;
  • Physical remains with chain of custody reports.
Davidsson contends that not only has the government not proven its case against the 19, it has not even established probable cause. READ MORE

Excerpt:

And another name from the Flight 11 list was reported by the Boston Globe to be Abdulrahman al-Omari (who we were told sat next to Mohamed Atta on the plane). But on the list of hijackers released Sept. 14, 2001 by the Justice Department, the name was Abdulaziz al-Omari (sometimes written Abdul Aziz).

Meanwhile, the Washington Post listed the name as Abdulrahman that same day. But Abdulaziz was living in Saudi Arabia, according to the Saudi embassy in Washington. The Independent reported on Sept. 17 that he had walked into the U.S. consulate in Jeddah to demand an explanation for why he was being accused of being a suicide hijacker.

Excerpt:

LIES WITHIN LIES

Maybe the craziest pillar in the whole story comes from the so-called “confession” video of Osama bin Laden that was released in December 2001. The video is clearly a fake given that it features a bin Laden double, and not a very good one at that.[12]

But what’s really intriguing is that the fake bin Laden mentions the name of nine of the alleged hijackers during the confession. But five of those nine ended up still being alive. Why would the real perpetrator of the 9/11 crime give credit to five men who turned out not to be involved?

The story that 19 Muslims named by the FBI were responsible for hijacking four airliners and killing themselves in the process simply cannot stand up to examination. In fact we know for a fact that it is false.

This, like the rest of the official story of 9/11, is so thin you can see right through it. READ MORE

Who Is Hiding Behind 9/11 Attack - New Mind-Blowing Conspiracy Theory Documentary 2015






Sunday, May 22, 2016

9/11 - The Impossible Case of the WTC Collapses






September 11th in a nutshell - State Of The Art Reconstruction of WTC

 More:  HERE AND HERE




https://youtu.be/_W00HXsep_c

https://youtu.be/wOWkseSmfBQ

pulverised & vaporized bodies 911

Just in case anyone tries to tell you this was a gravity driven collapse,  rather than an explosives created disaster.




9/11, The Hijackers






What Happened to the 9/11 "Planes" and "Hijackers"?

Take this one with a very large grain of salt.  While I'm sure they meant well in putting this together, critical thinking sort of escaped them.  Of course,  they couldn't be expected to realize that no plane was going to be able to overcome several box steel columns, backed by 52 inch steel spandrel plates, which are themselves braced up against 4 inch concrete slabs on steel pans supported by the floor trusses bolted and welded to the core.  So any "complete penetration" would have to be an illusion created by using explosive charges. Obviously no remote system could be relied upon to strike the prepared area properly.  Only a CGI can do that.






9/11 Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake.



Michael Moore - Fahrenheit 9 11 Full Movie with dutch subs.