Saturday, December 31, 2016

What I Learned From the "PropOrNot" Propaganda List

This is killing America (No one can disprove any of it)

Friday, December 30, 2016

9/11/01: The Exploding Van With a Mural of a Plane Hitting The WTC (NYPD...

Stick a fork in the "Experiment" it's Done!!!

Ah, the little old Brzezinski has been replaced with Zee Big New Brzezinski.  I guess this is what happens when you're born to parents working Madison Avenue.  Okay! LOL, moving right along then,  The ink barely dry on his "Grand Chess board" tomb when in walks the Donald to slap the board to the floor and scatter the pieces.  Did the Zionist really think that they would be allowed to run America all by themselves?

 After some 400 years of oppression, the colonists had finally enough to be motivated to try something new.  A democratic republic that would be subject to the rule of law.  The problem is that,  under this type of rule,  the general public must have a good idea of what's going on and how things get done,  as well as the reasons therefore.  To fix this problem a scheme of public education was passed into law.  

That worked fine for a while, but the world just kept getting more and more complex as new discoveries were  made.  Radio and Television appeared and were quickly "weaponized".  By Hitler to subdue Germany, then by the U.S. to mold public opinion via Pearl Harbor.  But soon those wars were over and with a military industrial complex, chomping at the bit for the next big production schedule,  Eisenhower had to warn us of things to come, lot of good that did.

Using your tax dollars the CIA seized control of the media and used it for the benefit of the military industrial complex. Fomenting hatred of "others" they managed to sell war after war.  As pols learned from time after time, that no one gets punished for mistakes and blunders, or even for criminal designs, they became ever more increasingly emboldened until 911 became a capstone event. 

This bold thrust onto the pubic,  without evidence, science, equipment or proof,  a false narrative was pushed onto the public and it was swallowed hook line and sinker for many a year.  One reason was because over the years the American educational system has been eroded away almost to the point of being ineffective.  The main thrust of education is to arm students with the ability to think critically and not be easily fooled by fakery.  This made the nation resistant to brainwashing.  But then, Madison Avenue and the Military Industrial Complex decided there was a lot of  money to be made by brainwashing America by themselves.  Thus the brainwashed American became the norm and gov't could and did, get away with whatever it wanted.

Well, as we know things change.  With brainwashed Americans at the mercy of their gov't,  foreign powers began to salivate at gaining access to some of those levers of power,  seeing as America was the most powerful nation on earth.  The trouble is,  when they should have been trying to put "big dangerous America" back on its solid footing,  they all sought to enjoy the short term advantages of running successful missions using a deceived America as the weapon of choice.  

Now the brainwashing has gone too far and Donald Trump is the new infant terrible.   No one can figure what he will do because he has no idea himself.  He doesn't, for example, understand the meaning of "MAD" (mutually assured destruction).  So, when he says that our nuclear arsenal needs to be improved and increased,  he's telling you that:  1) He doesn't know that we already have enough weapons to destroy the world several times over all by ourselves.  The other side doesn't even have to fire a shot and we can sterilize the planet.

2) He doesn't know that a nuclear war is one that cannot be "won",  it is a last ditch effort to make absolutely sure that our enemies go to their graves as surely as they send us to ours.  

3) He might come to conclude as Donald Rumsfeld did, that: hey, maybe we should do the first strike thing?  You know, catch them by surprise so they can't retaliate.  Which may sound reasonable to an ignorant fool.  Any knowledgeable  person is totally horrified by such dangerous thinking.  

Well, with that grand chessboard on the floor and Trump kicking the pieces under the couch.  With foreign powers scurrying for a hand on America's levers of power,  it will be well neigh impossible to carry out any coordinated mission with precision.  So, what we're going to get instead is a good long period of confusion, showing just how goofy our leadership is.  Watch as these clowns run to the right one day, then scramble to the left the next day,  then try to explain that left is right and right is left and that although they agree with all of it, they themselves are part of none of it.  I just pray that no one gets hurt while the meltdown progresses.  

Looking back down the corridors of time, a funny little fact emerges.  The greatest enemy of all great empires it turns out is not poverty but, get this: Prosperity!  It is prosperity that makes people complacent and inattentive to the national state of affairs.  It is prosperity that hardens the hearts of the prosperous against the impoverished,  who rational people, more attentive maintaining their own prosperity, should be devising ways to bring them along.  

When everyone has little to nothing,  they look at their fellow man as a friend, but when lots of people have lots of things, that same fellow man becomes little more than competition.  The "haves" chasing after the "have mores" have little time or interest in the plight of the "have nots".   While the "have mores" use their access to the law to "circle the wagons" against social mobility.  Until finally the entire enterprise becomes one writing such ridiculous,  misshapen and mangled laws that the nature behind them becomes oppressingly apparent and thus compliance becomes increasingly difficult to obtain.  Innovation is squelched, the treasury spent, and gains become difficult if not impossible to obtain.  

If history teaches anything it should be that vagaries of prosperity are what should be guarded against.  But, because prosperity is commonly thought to be such a good thing,  who would think it to be the harbinger of a societies downfall, but that is exactly what it is. 

Thursday, December 1, 2016

Putin made a master stroke and few people noticed it.

Only someone, very wise in the ways of the world, could have crafted such an action. Nor is there any need to guess at where this action will take the world, but Putin is jockeying to become a world leader and he's well on his way to accomplishing that task. Read on:

The utility of war and warfare has a long history, steeped, as it were in deception, intrigue and economics. For those who have read the classics you know that at the root of all wars is resources. Tribes held productive lands while nomads wandered from place to place. As these wanders grew in numbers, and as settled people prospered, the wanders, seeking to survive, decided that it was better to die in battle than to simply sit patiently and starve to death. So, first they drove hunter gatherers from productive sections of jungle, then gouged themselves on the fruits of their conquests.

The trouble was, they were not as good at husbanding their newly acquired lands as the former settlers had been. Why should they be any good at caring for the land? They were wanders, when the land they were on gave out, they simply picked up and sought another battle for the resources they needed.

Then came the farmers. With care, and labor they tended their crops and were able to raise more than sufficient produce for themselves and so there was something to trade. Trade allowed people to leave the land and pursue other ideas about creating resources. For example potters and masons. It was no longer necessary to have everyone working at farming and tending animals. But raiders came to take away the farmers production as well as any resources, gold, copper, silver etc., that the non-farmers had earned.

After a while the farmers realized they needed an army to protect their stores and so gov't was born. With gov't came leadership and power in the hands of a few. At first the duties of gov't were rudimentary, simply to protect from invaders and collect taxes, which were gov't's principal source of income. Then they expanded their powers to settle disputes and regulate trade and finally as they became more sophisticated, they began bestowing and removing rights. As a societies ultimate weapon, gov't came to hold the power of life and death over each and every citizen. As the system of governance became more complex, with the growth of the population and trade, a forum of associates, known by various titles, was devised to share these immense powers.

In the course of governing, the immense power of leadership allowed for the public treasuries to be either handled in a proper fashion, or squandered uselessly as the prowess (or lack thereof) of successive leadership provided.

As you can easily see from this “quick and dirty” narrative, the problems faced by governments was the selection of leaders and the matter of ruling by law. In the first instance, the means of succession of leadership was often decided by matter of birthright, this did not work so well as Caligula's two year reign of terror reveals. Still this method continued to be widely used. More modern governments use various voting schemes. These tend to fail because the population of voters isn't fully apprised of what constitutes good leadership.
Those who would be “king” realize that people are attracted to “strong” leaders, thus they hold themselves out to be “strong” by posing in a dictatorial fashion, rather than having some operational plan. At times campaigning for votes becomes more like some sort of movie script or tv commercial, than an actual appeal to be the next leader.

Look at Rome 1000 CE (or AD if you prefer), they had waterwheels and even hydro-dynamically driven piston motors. Now can you imagine what Rome could have become had they invested in that technology? So, the question is “why didn't they?” The answer is: Slavery! Because they had slaves to do the manual labor, they had no need of labor saving devices. Because they had not deemed it wise or prudent to educate the citizenry, there was no effort engaged to take technology to the next step. Slavery held them back, away from a future that would have been more prosperous than anything they could have imagined. That should be a lesson for every nation on earth, but sadly no, it isn't.

The use of steam engines would have been advanced almost a thousand years earlier. They had the metal, they had the means, the early start would have been troublesome without stainless steel to resist corrosion, but they also had glass which might have been used as a coating. Who knows how fast technology would have produced needed solutions. We do know, however, how much a water or steam driven mill can produce. But then, here we are, almost one thousand years of wasted effort, because leaders and public valued “strong” over “smart”.

Today we live in a world that is much more technologically advanced. So much so, in fact, that without our technology a good portion of the worlds population could not survive. Meaning that today, we are more dependent on smart than we ever were on “strong”. Terrorism? The Romans suffered it too. Why you ask? Well, because they wouldn't let people outside come inside and join in their prosperous society. They pressed invidious distinctions to keep “outsiders” out and it became their down fall.

Their own prosperity had weakened them to the point where they could no longer raise armies, they fell to hiring mercenaries. Mercenaries are loyal only to those who pay their salaries. Who pays the most, or offers the most, gets their support. When Rome fell under siege they could no longer trade, they could no longer pay and they were starved into submission by a horde with no education at all, just an ability to kill more and quicker than anyone else. Nature abhors a vacuum, to be of greatest use, education must flow to the masses or be rendered useless. If people cannot understand the intricacies of the systems that support the social/economic structure they survive by, they'll senselessly trash it without a care, only to face the consequences later. And “later” does nobody any good.

Which brings us back to today. Today where the Bush administration wildly sold the nation on the futile utility of war, in an effort to appear to be strong, he squandered both human and economic resources and gave the world reason to pause and reflect on US leadership. One doesn't lead by going around kicking people in the head. One leads by convincing others that their plans are good and/or better than what has gone before. In that light, the PNAC seems so outrageously silly, it appears to have more likely been crafted in an insane asylum than in some lofty “think tank”, by people of high caliber. The notion that one can stop terrorist attacks from occurring by the willful and wanton, randomized killing and displacement of millions of people, is something for psychiatrist and mental health professionals to behold. For example, the PNAC hadn't a clue that the oil they intended should pay the costs of the war, was already under contract to US oil companies. Thus, we wound up, in effect, taking possession of oil we had already brought and paid for. Worse, our European allies also had contracts for that oil, which, it turns out had to be honored as well. So “Mr and Mrs “PNAC” no war spoils oil for you! It should not have taken a genius to figure that out, long before the first shot was fired.

So here we have Donald J. Trump, planning to write some invidious distinctions into law. Yet another simplistic solution to a problem that, in reality doesn't exist, except in the minds of “supremacists” who seem to believe that, no matter your schooling or intelligence level, no matter your commitment to hard work, somehow the color of ones skin or their state of origin somehow makes them better suited to enjoy life, liberty and the right to peacefully pursue happiness. Go figure.

The gravest danger to the republic is that, like nations of old, a leader, untutored in governing will make an ungovernable mess of things. Putting into high office, officials whose main calling is some ideological bend, rather than people with a good grasp of the paradigms in operation therein, we get mangled decisions that either require constant correction, or that block the deployment of critical resources to fix problems while they're still small enough to be fixed. Try to imagine what a Clarence Thomas or an Antonin Scalia would have been at The First Continental Congress. At a time when a word here, a phrase there could have altered the course of U.S. History for the millions of people we have today.

But no, I won't say what Putin's masterful stroke was, if you didn't get it, don't worry you will eventually. I just don't want it's effect to be minimized by premature attention. It's already made the news once, fear not, it will again.


Thursday, November 17, 2016

What a mess we've lived through...

Bush and Cheney are given a pass!  They did not respond to warnings of a terrorist attack, in fact they hamstrung anyone who attempted to concentrate identification, prevention or who even theorized that an attack might be coming.  Instead of listening to their security advisors and putting their intelligence people and forces on alert status, they simply went fishing.  When the attacks happened it found our agencies in disarray, hamstrung my new rules that confounded the ability to respond.  Even down to the last few minutes, after two crashes in NYC, Cheney sat in the EOC getting reports on the whereabouts of an incoming skyjacked airliner and he did not call around to see what was being done or to ensure that key people were warned and taking steps to protect lives.  

Then, after the attacks were over, the Bush administration wanted us to believe that Saddam was somehow involved, when our own intelligence people knew that he wasn't.  They knew, for example that Saddam and OBL were enemies.  But, on top of that, they wanted us to believe tha Iraq, after taking a beating with bombings over a decade long and suffering sanctions that were causing starvation.  The told us he was making weapons of mass destruction and that our intelligence services got it all wrong.  Well,  you don't refine uranium with a single centrifuge, you need hundreds of them and that requires several buildings to house them.  While biological and chemical weapons programs require a huge research and development campus.   You'd think our intelligence people would know this and of course they did.  Meaning that this information was imprisoned by someone with the authority to do so.  Which explains the U,N. voting no. 

Then Bush sends our troop to fight an unnecessary war and suffer the injuries that come with warfare.  But, he cuts their benefits and pay while they're fighting,  So they're coming home homeless and suffering PTSD and Bush is unconcerned with their plight. Our troops were committing suicide in record numbers.  But all the Republicans can find to scream about is Hillary's emails and ObamaCare.    

Well, now they've got it all, the White house, the Senate and the House,  let's see if they have anything approaching a realistic view of how a government works.  This is not some childish game where he who can scream the loudest wins.  This is about running a nation, if they fail to do it right the nation will cease to follow, or worse.


Wednesday, November 9, 2016

Rebekah Roth 9/11 Methodical Illusion Methodical Deception Special

While there's some claims that she was not a flight attendant, that doesn't matter if her research is verifiable. This video is simply loaded with good information, easily verifiable.

Monday, November 7, 2016

END OF THE U.S. CORRUPT SYSTEM - What are the Reasons? ( Full Documentary)


Dr. Judy Wood IRREFUTABLE 9/11

While the vids of 911, taken before WTC 7 came down, show Vesey street clear of debris when it should be literally covered in what Judy calls "wheat cheks" vids made years later show debris magically appearing and increasing. Plane parts mysteriously increasing at the Pentagon and Shanksville over the years but still no black boxes for you.

Oh, and Judy doesn't realize that with gas prices what they were, it makes more sense to drive cars with no engines to consume expensive fuel, right? LOL

No higher resolution exists of Second Plane from the FOIA Releases Update 3

Kyle Simonson who filmed the second plane strike is heard asking questions about the plane he jjust zoomed in, again and again to catch just a second before it hit the south tower, then blacked out after noticing the nose of the plane emerge on the other side intact, hmmmm...  He says he didn't think he got it?????????????????????

9/11 - Absolutely Impossible Speeds from the Hijacked Aircraft

Yet some people do not understand that, an aircraft that will be severely damaged by 500mph air under 14.7lbs/sq.in. or by hitting a 25 lb duck, cannot slice through a steel and concrete building as if it were moving through air.  Oh, and did I say that the videos of flight 175 don't agree?  Yes I did and after reviewing some of these films again, I noticed that the clouds in the pictures are different!  Wait just a minute, "clouds"?  Where did clouds come from on that crystal clear Sept. day?  But there they appear in all their glory on some of the vids. The more you watch the videos the more anomalies you see.


Sunday, November 6, 2016

9/11 TRUTH DECAY Studies in Propaganda 2016

She gets a lot wrong, but there's also a lot of good info in there as well.

About Conspiracy theories

First let me say this, anyone who denigrates another person, simply for having a conspiracy theory, is an ignorant fool unworthy of further attention.

There are all types of theories, psychological theories, scientific theories, mechanical theories, artistic and musical theories, they come in all shapes, sizes and colors too numerous to mention. But, at the heart of it all is the fact that, a theory, to be useful as a working theory, as opposed to being some propagandist or political construction. must have some basis in fact to support it.

A theory is only an idea that has been constructed to explain the observed facts.  A theory does not, in and of itself, have to be true or false, because it is an attempt to explain observations, in a way that is understandable, so that it can be tested.  Tests alone will decide whether a theory is true or false, thus, only a person, who is blissfully ignorant of investigative methodology,  can or will assert that any theory is the work of a severely troubled mind, out of hand.

Look at Sean Hannity who says: "We saw the planes hit the buildings...etc.," Then think for a minute. He was sitting in a studio when the planes supposedly  hit.  He asserts that he saw the planes, simply because he believes that what he saw on tv was real,  and therefore you should believe it too.  He ignores the fact that he did not see anything first hand, and the descriptions of the events, from those who claimed to have seen them first hand are all over the place.  Mind you, they are all supposedly looking at the very same event as it is taking place.  But, some say it was a small twin engine private plane, some say it was commuter aircraft,  While a trained observer in a police helicopter describes flt 175 as a "dark green plane". Not only do the descriptions vary widely from witness to witness, so too do the sounds of, what should be a heavy jet aircraft, flying low with it's engines open full bore.  Some describe it as having been silent,  while others claim to have heard anything other than the memorable earsplitting roar that should have been there.  The recording equipment, which should have faithfully captured the very same sounds that the other recorders had,  did not agree either.

Then there's the "crash physics" of the planes gliding into the buildings, without either distorting or slowing and without even damaging the building in places until after the planes are completely inside and the kerosene explosions cover the impact areas.  Of course,  you could not see that until much later on, when someone slowed the film down and was then able to observe the impact more carefully and closely.  What they observed was impossible.

Of course we then saw, we were told, the engine of flight 175 flying through the building and over to land on Murry Street,  but the only engine found there was a General Electric engine, of the type used on 747's.  United Airlines uses Pratt & Whitney.  When these anomalies are taken together,  the only theory that explains them all in the simplest fashion, is that there were no planes at all.  But, simply explosives placed inside the buildings to do the damage and disperse a huge cloud of burning combustible substance. Finished off by playing a video on tv to make it appear that planes had been the cause.

We note that the "amateur" videographers had better equipment than the network tv.  The networks captures some terrible pictures, hardly showing lower Manhattan on a clear sunny day.  And these videos should all agree on more than just flight paths,  but on sound, colors observable events,  but they do not.  Worse yet is that wings which can be damaged by bird strikes, are shown to be slicing into box steel columns, backed by 54 inch steel spandrels, which are themselves backed by 4 inch concrete slabs, resting on steel floor pans, held up by steel trusses.  These wings slice into the buildings steel facade as if the steel were less dense than 25 lb geese.

Now there are many theories available to explain some of these anomalies,  but only the ones that do not include planes, simply and elegantly explains them all. Please feel free to copy the link to this post and share it in appropriate places as you surf the net.  

Thursday, October 27, 2016

9/11, The Airplanes


Ex CIA agent explains how to delete the elite!

When the boys in the PNAC were thinking "look the USSR has collapsed and we're not doing anything about it",  you know, great opp to take over the world.  Except that these "Brainiacs" stumbled over the need for a new "Pearl Harbor" without realizing the reason therefor was to gain public approval, without which nothing can go forward.  So, to work they went on America's perceptions, but they forgot that the rest of the world has perceptions too. 

Now, having alienated the rest of the world, America is being seen as a very dangerous nation.  I don't think Americans are interested in having the world live in fear of us, but hey,  that's just my opinion I could be wrong.  But if we don't want the world to fear us,  we need to investigate 911 and the Iraq invasion.  Proof positive is needed and someone or some groups must be held to account for these catastrophes.

Monday, October 17, 2016

Sifting through the evidence...


 When analyzing a crime scene you try to do as little speculation as possible. Where the evidence leaves off is where the theorizing begins and then only to the extent needed and keeping it as simple as possible since, as any programmer or planner knows that complexity breeds further complexity.

So, all we can say that we "know" is from what the officials have divulged.  It is the attempts to use this information to reconstruct the events, that we discover the information given us doesn't work. It does not result in what was observed because science gets in the way.

1. They gave us 19 skyjackers, but 8 were found alive and one died a year prior.
2. They gave us "calls from the planes" but the state of the technology at that time says that was not possible.
3. They gave us passengers boarding at specific gates at specific airports. But none of the cctv evidence that should be there exists.
4. They gave us untrained "pilots" to fly heavy aircraft at impossible speeds while performing maneuvers that experienced pilots say would over tax themselves.
5. They gave us impact videos that simply are not possible at all. Planes cannot crash into steel and concrete buildings without deforming at all, and pass through leaving momentary video evidence of no damage at all.

So these are the things that we know.  The simplest explanation for no. 5 is that it is manipulated video and not the "live" observations they told us we were looking at. 

So, we really don't know if there were actual planes, because if there were we did not see them.  The "eyewitnesses" are of no help, because they all saw and heard different things.  Things so different that there is nothing that confirms each others story.  This doesn't happen in real life.  If a car crashes into a truck, the witnesses may get the colors or timing wrong, but they will all say "a car and a truck".  We don't have that kind of baseline description here. The simplest way that could happen is, if there were no planes at all, leaving the witnesses to conjure with their own imaginations.

In fact, further analysis has discovered that some of the people who claimed to have seen the planes with their own eyes,  it turns out that they actually had no view of the planes at all. 

So, with no passengers, no hijackers, no pilots, no cell phone calls, no impossible speeds, no ace pilot maneuvers etc., the simplest answer to it all is that there were no planes.  In fact, if you go back to the initial coverage you'll note that the eyewitnesses didn't see planes but anchors viewing monitors in their studies saw them and tried to correct the eyewitnesses. Everyone looking at  tower 2 should have seen a plane!  They had no reason to lie because they had no clue as to what was happening.

Worse yet is, I'm only touching the most glaring points, in the background there are a lot more.  While Captain Scully's plane, flying low over the Hudson with it's engines cut off to boot, generated hundreds of 911 calls, Atta;s plane, flying low with it's engines open full bore, generated not one 911 call. 

Wednesday, October 12, 2016

9/11, The Hijackers


NEWLY RELEASED! 9-11 WTC September 11 2001 Raw FAA ATC Air Traffic Control Audio Tapes 911

Uploaded on Sep 8, 2011
Full Text Transcript Here - http://aviationnewstoday.com/?p=624
New ATC FAA 9-11 WTC Audio Files Released.
This contains raw 9-11 ATC audio recordings from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) North American Aerospace Defense Command (Norad) and American Airlines from the morning of Sept. 11, 2001. The recordings, some of which have been published previously, are being released in a multimedia report put together originally to be part of the Sept. 11 Commission's 2004 report.

9/11 Trillions: Follow The Money - Published on Sep 11, 2015

TRANSCRIPT, SOURCES AND MP3: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=16167

11 Critical Questions About Sept 11 Still Left Unanswered


The Problem 911 for Truth movements face

The biggest problem that 911 truth movement faces is that they have been unable to gain a constituency of officials, office holders and lawmakers to champion their cause. No group of senators or representatives, sufficient to push the case has appeared despite the mass of evidence collected.

Since politics in the U.S. are mostly controlled by localities, representatives are elected by people in local congressional districts and Senators by state wide elections, any hope of succeeding would mean penetrating many of these districts and convincing the voters of each to vote in favor of the issues involved, making it a very serious political issue.  One that had to be addressed if one was to gain office. Because unless and until that happens the issues can be safely ignored by officials.

CIA Insider Tells 911 truth. Time to re-examine your World-view, America!


16 DISTURBING 9/11 Facts the Masses NEED to Know - Part 3


Monday, October 10, 2016

Top 10 Reasons To Believe There Was A Conspiracy To Assassinate JFK

In case anyone wonders why there was no public outcry over these anomalies, in the years following the event, most material does not mention that the backdrop was a very dangerous cold war that the public had reason to fear could turn hot.

In the overall, people were given to weighing their desire to know more, with the fear of discovering a communist plot and the nuclear holocaust that might ensue on that account. Talk about your cognitive dissonance. So, the fact that the "investigation" was steering away from Russian complicity, was something few if any would want to tamper with. If the authorities did discover U.S.S.R. hands covered with this blood, it was hoped that some way, other than nuclear war, would be found to make them pay.

Torn between fear of nuclear war and the desire to know more, had the nation treading on eggshells. While some were pointing out the contraindications of the Warren Report etc., John Q. Public kept quiet, even if they did take notice.

Of course it would have been inappropriate to give voice to such fears in the wake of the assignation and so nobody would or did discuss it. But you could not help but wonder if this was going to be the cause for the way the world would end. 

Wednesday, October 5, 2016

The Failure to Intercept: Timeline and Over 50 Questions the 9/11 Commission

The Failure to Intercept: Timeline and Over 50 Questions the 9/11 Commission Part II Should Ask High Officials

By: Joël v.d. Reijden | Date: April 6, 2015 | Last update: Jan. 28, 2016 | 9/11 STUDY CENTER
911_WTC_intercepts_failure
"The decades-old procedure for a quick response by the nation's air defense had been changed in June of 2001. Now, instead of NORAD's military commanders being able to issue the command to launch fighter jets, approval had to be sought from the civilian Defense Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld. This change is extremely significant, because Mr. Rumsfeld claims to have been "out of the loop" nearly the entire morning of 9/11. ... The families of the vanished bodies and unsettled souls of 9/11 are still waiting to have the dots connected."
 
June 21, 2004, New York Observer, '9/11 Tapes Reveal Ground Personnel Muffled Attacks'
Contents
  1. Intro
  2. Oversight
  3. A timeline of unprecedented failure
  4. Basic conclusions on timeline

  5. Additional questions for NORAD
  6. Additional questions for the FAA and General Mike Canavan
  7. Additional questions for Bush and Cheney
  8. Additional questions for Rumsfeld
  9. Additional questions for Norman Mineta
  10. Additional questions for the original 9/11 Commission

  11. Notes
"We have been unable to identify the source of this mistaken FAA information [about this non-existent phantom aircraft]. ... This response to a phantom aircraft was not recounted in a single public timeline or statement issued by the FAA or Department of Defense. ... No one at FAA headquarters ever asked for military assistance with American 77. ... FAA headquarters [didn't] pass any of the information it had about United 93 to the military... Langley fighters were not headed north toward the Baltimore area [which was already wrong] as instructed, but east over the ocean [which was double wrong]. ... The President told us he was frustrated with the poor communications that morning. He could not reach key officials [but initially refused to talk to Rice] ... [At 9:46] staff reported that they were still trying to locate Secretary Rumsfeld [then on the Pentagon lawn]... The President apparently spoke to Secretary Rumsfeld for the first time that morning shortly after 10:00. No one can recall the content of this conversation..."
 
2004, 9/11 Commission Report, pp. 26-27, 30, 34, 38, 40, 43. Just some of the failures that went on the morning of 9/11.

READ MORE

Monday, October 3, 2016

Should we ignore new 911 details


9/11 Verizon guy "Can you hear me now...... Good" - Expose Cell Calls from Planes


9/11 Activist Arrested For Telling The Truth About Building 7 in 2016

9/11 & Building 7... What The Sheeple & Uninitiated Say (2016) 

 





Obama: Override of 9/11 bill veto a mistake


Beyond the 28 Pages - What A Real 9/11 Investigation Would Reveal


911 And The Saudi Connection - James Corbett and Charlie Strange on PFT Live

James Corbett starts at approx. 40 minutes.  The lead story is seal team 6.


Sunday, October 2, 2016

911 Has proven to be more costly than it was worth to the perps

Before 911 JFK's speech on secret societies hardly grabbed anyone by the lapels, so to speak, much talk of Bilderbergs, Skull and Bones, the Trilateral Commission and such seem more the fare of "spiritualists" and persons who see conspiracy behind every rock.  In the information age they became known as the tin foil hat wearing brigades,  toiling against imagined CIA mind beams and such.  What evidence they were able to muster seemed weak and easily dismiss able.  With the advent of 911, however,  the nation and indeed the world was sent on a wild paper chase for answers.

In this search for answers,  the affairs of secret societies kept rearing their heads as many of the people connected in some way to 911,  appeared to have such affiliations.  As the numbers of connections grew larger the anecdotal evidence of these secret societies grew stronger and stronger, so that now they are way passed being anything dismiss able. 

The matter of central banks and what they do, was of little to no interest to most,  until "follow the money" dragged central banking affairs into the limelight.  So that now, with an aware audience seeking answers available,  writers of all stripes are racing to "mine" this rich new vein of ore.  So that soon these memberships will begin to tarnish the creds of the holders.  I was going to write much more, but something is telling me not to, so enough said for now.

Congress Now Blaming Obama For Its Embarrassing Override Of His Veto

WASHINGTON — On Wednesday, Congress was so determined to pass a law to sue Saudi Arabia that it overrode President Barack Obama’s veto. But possible backlash against America had top Republican leaders looking for someone else to blame Thursday.
And they appear to have settled on Obama.
 
Opponents had argued that the bill was caving in to conspiracy theorists and that it would raise the specter of other nations hauling the United States into court for things it actually does — such as killing civilians in drone strikes. The White House called the override the “single most embarrassing thing that the United States Senate has done” in decades.

Even 28 lawmakers who had just helped to pass the first override of Obama’s presidency sent a letter to their own leaders Thursday saying maybe there should be changes.

So Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) leveled at least partial blame on Obama.
READ MORE

USA: 9/11 Suspects: General Ralph Eberhart, Philip Zelikow, Christine Todd Whitman ...


This will make you question EVERYTHING you see on TV


The Demolition of Truth: Psychologists Examine 9/11 - Broadcast Version


Tuesday, September 27, 2016

9/11 Truth: Pentagon Eyewitness Bob Pugh Tells His Story


Let's not be simplistic about 911

The JFK generation has passed.  They had no "gotcha's" sufficient to gain traction with and grow a ground swell of public opinion.  There were more people just willing to forget that horrible chapter, than who saw any good reason to revisit it with the evidence in such a state of controversiality, as it were.

911 is different in the respect that clear and overt actions were demonstrably predicated upon it.  Actions which to this day reverberate and resonate with the American public conscious. The Patriots Act, the NDAA, the torture, the tremendous and appalling consequences of two victimized nations.  Less the ill treatment of "truthers" the "suicides" the deaths and the outrageous lies.  The unfavorable turning of the world court of public opinion is not in accords with America's stated goals etc.. These are the things that are going to keep the pot boiling for a much longer time. 

Yet, the only solution possible will have to be a political solution and that requires a very highly motivated and cohesive ground swell of public opinion, of such magnitude and scope that it cannot be ignored.  This is why the culprits are hiding behind the last shreds of their weapons; confusion. denial and fear, with threats to silence anyone whose persona might crystallize public opinion any time soon.

If a military man or public official doesn't tow the line, for lack of fear for his own life, then he'll have to face the fear for his family and loved ones.  Palfrey and Champagne for example, might have thought it would simply be enough to come forward with their evidence.  They now stand as a marked example of the quandary any evidence holder might logically have: "To whom do I go with this material?"  The media won't touch it, Congress is cowed, and the landscape is riddled with people who would see any such effort subverted.

I am sure, for example, that many more people than just David Hanschu had taken photo or videos of no plane striking the south tower.  I'm just as sure that people who had such evidence rushed, either to the media or the FBI with their shocking new evidence.  If so, it was collected and will never again see the light of day.  Smarter people would know to be extremely circumspect about even letting it be known that such evidence even exists, since it represents a grave and serious danger to themselves and their loved ones. Only with the outrage rises to cacophony of a deafening din will the time be ripe for disclosures.

 Who Was Really Behind the 9/11 Attacks? 

 

The 9/11 Suspects

9/11 Suspects: Rudy Giuliani 

9/11 Suspects: Christine Todd Whitman 

9/11 Suspects: Philip Zelikow 

9/11 Suspects: General Ralph Eberhart 

9/11 Suspects: The Dancing Israelis 

9/11 Suspects: Robert Baer 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17 More DISTURBING 9/11 Facts You'll Wish Weren't True - Pt 2


15 Disturbing 9/11 Facts You'll Wish Weren't True


3 Ways To Prove 9/11 Is A Conspiracy


Wednesday, September 21, 2016

Fox News Live 9/11 15 years later

Published 9.16.2016 says it all.  A video just packed full of lies, untruths, fake video and inconsistencies when compared with the original reports released on 9/11.
How many can you spot?










Need help?  A man says he saw a body strapped into a passenger seat.  Well, in earlier news reports they said that the only bodies found were, one of the skyjackers strapped into the pilots seat, that's at the front of the plane, and a flight attendant with her hands tied behind her back.  Forgetting that the flight attendants were in the back of the planes and talking on phones.  Yeah, right, with their hands tied behind their back they're saying things like "I don't know but we may be being hijacked!" Ya think?

But, you see, they expect us not to remember the stories they told from one day to the next,  but they're tying themselves in knots trying to answer the questions being asked.  They're having to create answers that conflict with their earlier reports.  SMH

Wow, this thing is so packed with lies one could write a book just showing them, FBI, for example reports Olson's phone call from wife as lasting 0:00 minutes:seconds in documents submitted to trial of Zacariaa Moussoui (yeah I spelled it wrong no matter).  The media lies, officials lie, the President lies, the V.P. lies, the Sec. Def. lies, lies, lies and more lies. No wonder that evidence has been destroyed and everything else is classified.  Just what you'd expect if nothing was true!

9/11 Fifteen Years Later - What Have We Learned?


Monday, September 19, 2016

They Are Deceiving You: The No Plane / Hologram / CGI Theory - John Lear, Judy Wood, DISINFO EXPOSED

There are quite a number of things wrong with this video.  Not the least of which is that skyjackers were supposed to have purchased tickets and flown on regularly scheduled, commercial airline flights.  Flight 175, therefore, has to be a normal airliner belonging to United Airlines, which uses Prat and Whitney engines,  so it doesn't matter what size plane it was, they all used Pratt and Whitney engines and certainly not the engines that GE uses to power 747's.

Next up is the fact that these steel box columns are not stand alone structural elements,  but they are backed by steel spandrel plates that stiffen them against compound forces like bending.  To break these columns you have to compress the steel on the front side while stretching the steel on the opposite side, the spandrel plates resists that, while the 4 inch concrete slabs, behind the spandrel plates offer increased resistance.

Modern Jetliners are built lighter and lighter, to save fuel, using more advanced materials. Airliners are built to handle forces in the range of 2.5 g's.  Although they can probably handle 4 to 5 g's for an extra margin of safety, they sustain damage when they do.  Have you seen the damage caused by bird strikes?  If not then search "bird strikes" on youtube.  Then remember these are soft 15 and 20 lbs birds.  Next, try to imagine what a 50 lb steel barbell strike would do.  Then try to imagine what a 1000 lb steel plate strike would do to an airliner.  Now realize that these steel box columns on 40 inch horizontal centers, backed by 52 inch steel spandrel plates and concrete slabs on 12 foot vertical centers, which present a structure weighing several hundred tons, would do to an aircraft that can just barely handle a bird strike or 3 to 5 g forces.

That John Lear has some crazy ideas, only goes to show he's not very scientific.  However, those ideas did not stop him from gaining proficiency at flight, nor did they prevent him from successfully piloting aircraft up to his retirement.  Rather, the fact that he speaks his mind, only shows that he is not controlled by peer pressure. And he does know about flight, having flown these aircraft for dozens of years.  So, while I won't trust what he knows about other things, I will trust what he knows about planes and flying.  To put things another way; would the idea that the surgeons knife is in the hands of a person who believes in a different god than you do, negate the fact that he can perform a surgery he is renowned for having performed many times?

The idea that there were planes must be preserved because that preserves the credibility of the media, so it can be used in the next false flag attack.  But, go back and look, NORAD, which is tasked with detecting and intercepting a nuclear attack, must not be prey to falsification and certainly not fake inputs from any American systems.  Cold War protocols were careful to include scenarios of moles inside our own military, working to sabotage our responses to a nuclear attack.  This is why NORAD could not be fooled by war games.  Yet, we note that, while FAA controllers could see the skyjacked planes, NORAD with it's real world screens could not.  Missiles or drones could not be under foreign control, thus, they would be the same effect as would explosives placed in the buildings. NORAD is using it's technology and can not detect any planes, but the EOC is suing crafted talk to create an image of a detected aircraft on it's way to a target.  Which is more logical to believe?  Plane or no plane?

Now watch these carefully crafted lies and see if you can spot the falsehoods being used:

David Icke 9/11 documentary 2016 - Was An Inside Job | truth about 911


Saturday, September 17, 2016

Yitzhak Rabin Biography Documentary

Peace and the rule of law, human rights etc., requires courage, warfare requires only bigotry, deceit and, because those who order wars do not fight themselves, cowardice. A fearful people will never enjoy freedom, because tolerance requires courage and peace requires tolerance.

The Israeli JFK?

Thursday, September 15, 2016

Pilots had crash axes available


John Chesire, Four decades of aviation experience.
In the US, not in the cabin but in the flight deck, as mandated by the FAA.

FAA Sec. 91.513 — Emergency equipment.
[...]
(e) Each airplane accommodating more than 19 passengers must be equipped with a crash axe.

Rebekah Roth 9/11 Methodical Illusion Methodical Deception Special 

 

September 11th: The New Hiroshima


Tuesday, September 13, 2016

September 11th: The New Hiroshima


9/11 In Plane Site - Directors Cut

Why would he go on and on about what's under the plane and not talk about the impossible crash physics?

The DECISION was made....

The focus should not be on what was meant by "pull it".  The fact of the matter is that it's claimed that fires brought down the building.  But, Silverstien, himself, is telling us that the building came down by a DECISION that had been made.  As a result of that DECISION, he says is, "We watched the building collapse!"

David Ray Griffin 2011 "911 Miracles"

 

What A Way To Go: Life at the end of Empire (full movie)


Sunday, September 11, 2016

IMPOSSIBLE 911 FOOTAGE

We're looking due east so that we can see well into the space between the North and South Towers.  Yet the Empire State Building is on the left of the north tower, while Citi Corp tower and the Chrysler Building are off to the left of the south tower.  Watch and see thie poorly composited video get worse.

Howard Stern's 9/11 Broadcast with Paired Footage 

 

 A gun is found next to a body,  it's determined to be the murder weapon.  The owner is found, accused and executed.  What is the difference between that and the witch hunts of Salem?

America was supposed to be better than that.  We, unlike any other country on earth,  would have the courage to afford the accused a trial where they could confront their accusers,  contest the evidence against them and be released if not proven guilty.  No longer would the mere word of the King or his Noble men be enough to deprive a citizen of life, liberty or property and the right to pursue happiness.


But, there we were in 2001, right back to where we were, at law, before this country was started.  See a crime and immediately it's: "Get the rope boys,  we already know who did it!" No need for an investigation because,  no ill intended criminal would ever think of possibly escaping justice by simply having the evidence point to someone else.  So,  just leave the body right there on the ground,  paint a sign saying: "Right this way to the murderer! ---> x

Does anyone still realize that things may not be what they appear to be?  Go read at "The Innocence Project" to see just how many times CSI gets it wrong.  Bush promised a swift investigation that never came before he trundled off to war against the people he so quickly accused,  who turned out not to be guilty in the end.  15 years later and what have we got?  The FBI still has no evidence that OBL did 911 and half of the skyjackers are proven innocent because they were never on the planes.  The accused, found innocent, were Saudi's not Afghani's and Iraq had nothing at all to do with 911, nor did they have any wmd's or any plans to attack anyone. 

   Oh well,  any intelligence agency can and does get infiltrated.  The only way to find out what's going on inside them is to dissolve them.  Then the infiltrators must flee like rats from a sinking ship.  Enough said!




Former CBS Reporter Exposes Media Lies, Internet Shills & Astroturfing - MUST SEE!!!